Compare eCash vs Starknet
Open in ChatGPTeCash vs Starknet Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
eCash TPS is 98.73% lower than Starknet TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
eCash max TPS is 91.81% lower than Starknet max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
eCash max theoretical TPS is 94.71% lower than Starknet max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
eCash transaction volume is 98.73% lower than Starknet transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
eCash block time is 171X longer than Starknet block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
eCash finality is 92.46% shorter than Starknet finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
eCash is a layer 1 blockchain, while Starknet is a layer 2 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
eCash has 97.24% fewer total transactions than Starknet
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
eCash was launched 1 year before Starknet
Data from Chainspect
eCash vs Starknet Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
eCash Nakamoto Coefficient is 3X higher than Starknet Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators/Miners
eCash has 33X more miners than Starknet has validators
Data from Chainspect
Stake/Hashrate
eCash hashrate is 0.07 EH/s, while Starknet has no data
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
eCash is PoW, while Starknet is Rollup (ZK)
Data from Chainspect
Governance
eCash council governance is worse than Starknet on-chain governance
Data from Chainspect
eCash vs Starknet Developer Activity
Developers
eCash has 2.61X more developers than Starknet
Data from Chainspect
Commits
eCash has 2.31X more commits than Starknet
Data from Chainspect
Repos
eCash has 85.18% fewer repos than Starknet
Data from Chainspect
Stars
eCash has 58.28% fewer stars than Starknet
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
eCash has 1.23X more watchers than Starknet
Data from Chainspect
eCash vs Starknet Financials New
Chain Revenue
eCash chain revenue is 99.99% lower than Starknet chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
eCash average transaction fee is 99.99% lower than Starknet average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
eCash market cap is 35.84% lower than Starknet market cap
Data from Chainspect
FDV
eCash FDV is 63.28% lower than Starknet FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
eCash Market Cap to FDV ratio is 1.75X higher than Starknet Market Cap to FDV ratio
Data from Chainspect
Price
eCash price is 99.98% lower than Starknet price
Data from Chainspect
eCash vs Starknet Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
eCash Comparisons
About Blockchains
About eCash
eCash is a blockchain project led by Bitcoin ABC, aiming to enhance L1 scalability, security, transaction speed, and cost-effectiveness. It integrates the Avalanche consensus protocol with its base PoW consensus, making it effectively a hybrid consensus network that is secured against 51% attacks and extensible via subnets and hard-fork free upgrades. These improvements address scalability concerns, enable rapid transaction finality, interoperability, and guarantee subcent fees. Despite these improvements, eCash remains committed to maintaining the decentralization principles of the original Bitcoin protocol. By prioritizing scalability and extensibility, eCash seeks to realize the vision of Bitcoin as a practical and accessible peer-to-peer electronic cash system.
About Starknet
Starknet stands as a permissionless blockchain solution, functioning as a Validity-Rollup, often referred to as a zero-knowledge rollup (ZK rollup) for Ethereum. It's a Layer 2 (L2) platform that empowers dApps to achieve significant computational scalability while upholding Ethereum's inherent composability and security standards.