Compare eCash vs Sonic
Open in ChatGPTeCash vs Sonic Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
eCash TPS is 97.77% lower than Sonic TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
eCash max TPS is 97.25% lower than Sonic max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
eCash max theoretical TPS is 99.98% lower than Sonic max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
eCash transaction volume is 97.77% lower than Sonic transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
eCash block time is 355X longer than Sonic block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
eCash finality is 100% longer than Sonic finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
eCash and Sonic are both layer 1 blockchains
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
eCash has 95.78% fewer total transactions than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
eCash was launched 4 years before Sonic
Data from Chainspect
eCash vs Sonic Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
eCash Nakamoto Coefficient is 40% lower than Sonic Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators/Miners
eCash has 17.5% fewer miners than Sonic has validators
Data from Chainspect
Stake/Hashrate
eCash hashrate is 0.07 EH/s, while Sonic stake is $54.05M
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
eCash is PoW, while Sonic is PoS
Data from Chainspect
Governance
eCash council governance is worse than Sonic on-chain governance
Data from Chainspect
eCash vs Sonic Developer Activity
Developers
eCash has 9.26X more developers than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Commits
eCash has 2.6X more commits than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Repos
eCash has 71.42% fewer repos than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Stars
eCash has 16X more stars than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
eCash has 1.84X more watchers than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
eCash vs Sonic Financials New
Chain Revenue
eCash chain revenue is 99.99% lower than Sonic chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
eCash average transaction fee is 99.99% lower than Sonic average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
eCash market cap is 1.25X higher than Sonic market cap
Data from Chainspect
FDV
eCash FDV is 1.17X higher than Sonic FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
eCash Market Cap to FDV ratio is 1.07X higher than Sonic Market Cap to FDV ratio
Data from Chainspect
Price
eCash price is 99.98% lower than Sonic price
Data from Chainspect
eCash vs Sonic Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
eCash Comparisons
About Blockchains
About eCash
eCash is a blockchain project led by Bitcoin ABC, aiming to enhance L1 scalability, security, transaction speed, and cost-effectiveness. It integrates the Avalanche consensus protocol with its base PoW consensus, making it effectively a hybrid consensus network that is secured against 51% attacks and extensible via subnets and hard-fork free upgrades. These improvements address scalability concerns, enable rapid transaction finality, interoperability, and guarantee subcent fees. Despite these improvements, eCash remains committed to maintaining the decentralization principles of the original Bitcoin protocol. By prioritizing scalability and extensibility, eCash seeks to realize the vision of Bitcoin as a practical and accessible peer-to-peer electronic cash system.
About Sonic
Sonic is the highest-performing EVM layer-1 blockchain, combining speed, incentives, and world-class infrastructure, powering the next generation of DeFi applications. The chain provides 400,000 TPS and sub-second finality.
By combining a novel consensus mechanism with full EVM compatibility, Sonic delivers unparalleled speed, security, and scalability. The S token is Sonic's native token, used for paying transaction fees, staking, running validators, and participating in governance.