Compare eCash vs Redbelly
Open in ChatGPTeCash vs Redbelly Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
eCash TPS is 26.27% lower than Redbelly TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
eCash max TPS is 99.95% lower than Redbelly max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
eCash max theoretical TPS is 99.99% lower than Redbelly max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
eCash transaction volume is 26.35% lower than Redbelly transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
eCash block time is 8.86X longer than Redbelly block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
eCash finality is 100% longer than Redbelly finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
eCash and Redbelly are both layer 1 blockchains
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
eCash has 1.19X more total transactions than Redbelly
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
eCash was launched 4 years before Redbelly
Data from Chainspect
eCash vs Redbelly Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
eCash Nakamoto Coefficient is 3, while Redbelly has no data
Data from Chainspect
Validators/Miners
eCash has 33 miners, while Redbelly has no data
Data from Chainspect
Stake/Hashrate
eCash hashrate is 0.07 EH/s, while Redbelly has no data
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
eCash is PoW, while Redbelly is PoS
Data from Chainspect
Governance
eCash and Redbelly governance are both council
Data from Chainspect
eCash vs Redbelly Developer Activity
Developers
eCash has 87X more developers than Redbelly
Data from Chainspect
Commits
eCash has 107X more commits than Redbelly
Data from Chainspect
Repos
eCash and Redbelly have the same amount of repos
Data from Chainspect
Stars
eCash has 336X more stars than Redbelly
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
eCash has 19X more watchers than Redbelly
Data from Chainspect
eCash vs Redbelly Financials New
Chain Revenue
eCash chain revenue is 99.99% lower than Redbelly chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
eCash average transaction fee is 99.99% lower than Redbelly average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
eCash market cap is 12X higher than Redbelly market cap
Data from Chainspect
FDV
eCash FDV is 3.15X higher than Redbelly FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
eCash Market Cap to FDV ratio is 3.79X higher than Redbelly Market Cap to FDV ratio
Data from Chainspect
Price
eCash price is 99.84% lower than Redbelly price
Data from Chainspect
eCash vs Redbelly Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
eCash Comparisons
About Blockchains
About eCash
eCash is a blockchain project led by Bitcoin ABC, aiming to enhance L1 scalability, security, transaction speed, and cost-effectiveness. It integrates the Avalanche consensus protocol with its base PoW consensus, making it effectively a hybrid consensus network that is secured against 51% attacks and extensible via subnets and hard-fork free upgrades. These improvements address scalability concerns, enable rapid transaction finality, interoperability, and guarantee subcent fees. Despite these improvements, eCash remains committed to maintaining the decentralization principles of the original Bitcoin protocol. By prioritizing scalability and extensibility, eCash seeks to realize the vision of Bitcoin as a practical and accessible peer-to-peer electronic cash system.
About Redbelly
Redbelly Network is revolutionising asset tokenization, enabling businesses to tokenize assets like carbon credits and private equity on the blockchain.