eCash vs Redbelly Scalability
Real-time TPS
eCash TPS is 7.73X higher than Redbelly TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
eCash max TPS is 99.95% lower than Redbelly max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
eCash max theoretical TPS is 99.99% lower than Redbelly max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
eCash transaction volume is 7.75X higher than Redbelly transaction volume
Block Time
eCash block time is 3.81X longer than Redbelly block time
Finality
eCash finality is 100% longer than Redbelly finality
Type
eCash and Redbelly are both layer 1 blockchains
Launch Date
eCash was launched 4 years before Redbelly
eCash vs Redbelly Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
eCash Nakamoto Coefficient is 1, while Redbelly has no data
Validators/Miners
eCash has 14 miners, while Redbelly has no data
Stake/Hashrate
eCash hashrate is 0.0877 EH/s, while Redbelly has no data
Consensus Mechanism
eCash is PoW, while Redbelly is PoS
Governance
eCash and Redbelly governance are both council
eCash vs Redbelly Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
eCash Comparisons
About Blockchains
About eCash
eCash is a blockchain project led by Bitcoin ABC, aiming to enhance L1 scalability, security, transaction speed, and cost-effectiveness. It integrates the Avalanche consensus protocol with its base PoW consensus, making it effectively a hybrid consensus network that is secured against 51% attacks and extensible via subnets and hard-fork free upgrades. These improvements address scalability concerns, enable rapid transaction finality, interoperability, and guarantee subcent fees. Despite these improvements, eCash remains committed to maintaining the decentralization principles of the original Bitcoin protocol. By prioritizing scalability and extensibility, eCash seeks to realize the vision of Bitcoin as a practical and accessible peer-to-peer electronic cash system.
About Redbelly
Redbelly Network is revolutionising asset tokenization, enabling businesses to tokenize assets like carbon credits and private equity on the blockchain.