- Compare
- Crust vs Abstract
Crust vs Abstract Scalability
Real-time TPS
Crust TPS is 0 tx/s, while Abstract has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Crust max TPS is 0.06 tx/s, while Abstract has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Crust max theoretical TPS is 1,500 tx/s, while Abstract has no data
Transaction Volume
Crust transaction volume is 0 txns, while Abstract has no data
Block Time
Crust block time is 15.14s, while Abstract has no data
Finality
Crust finality is 30s, while Abstract has no data
Type
Crust is a parachain, while Abstract has no data
Launch Date
Crust was launched on Nov 21, 2022, while the Abstract has no data
Crust vs Abstract Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Crust Nakamoto Coefficient is 174, while Abstract has no data
Validators/Miners
Crust has 600 validators, while Abstract has no data
Stake/Hashrate
Crust stake is $2.947B, while Abstract has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Crust is Nominated Proof of Stake, while Abstract has no data
Governance
Crust governance is on-chain, while Abstract has no data
Other Comparisons
Crust Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Crust
Crust is a decentralized storage network built on Polkadot, a multi-chain blockchain platform. It aims to provide a decentralized storage solution that is secure, reliable, and cost-effective. Crust allows users to store and retrieve data in a web3 manner, leveraging the power of blockchain technology to ensure data integrity and availability. Crust uses a combination of blockchain and decentralized storage technologies to achieve its goals. It offers incentives for users to contribute their storage space to the network, creating a distributed storage infrastructure that is resistant to censorship and single points of failure.
About Abstract
Abstract is a Layer 2 (L2) network built on top of Ethereum, designed to securely power consumer-facing blockchain applications at scale with low fees and fast transaction speeds.
Built on top of the ZK Stack, Abstract is a zero-knowledge (ZK) rollup built to be a more scalable alternative to Ethereum; it achieves this scalability by executing transactions off-chain, batching them together, and verifying batches of transactions on Ethereum using (ZK) proofs.
Abstract is EVM compatible, meaning it looks and feels like Ethereum, but with lower gas fees and higher transaction throughput. Existing smart contracts built for Ethereum will work out of the box on Abstract (with some differences), meaning developers can easily port applications to Abstract with no or minimal changes.