Cronos vs Arbitrum Nova Scalability
Real-time TPS
Cronos TPS is 1.77 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Cronos max TPS is 141.7 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Cronos max theoretical TPS is 5,390 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Transaction Volume
Cronos transaction volume is 6,376 txns, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Block Time
Cronos block time is 0.53s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Finality
Cronos finality is 0s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Type
Cronos is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Launch Date
Cronos was launched on Nov 8, 2021, while the Arbitrum Nova has no data
Cronos vs Arbitrum Nova Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Cronos Nakamoto Coefficient is 4, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Validators/Miners
Cronos has 100 validators, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Stake/Hashrate
Cronos stake is $1.65B, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Cronos is PoS, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Governance
Cronos governance is on-chain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Other Comparisons
Cronos Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Cronos
Cronos emerges as an interoperable blockchain, streamlining the migration of applications and crypto assets from various chains while prioritizing low transaction costs, rapid throughput, and fast finalization times. It operates as an Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM)-compatible chain, augmented with support for Inter-Blockchain Communications (IBC) networks based on the Cosmos SDK. This integration empowers developers to create and launch dApps atop the EVM infrastructure.
About Arbitrum Nova
Arbitrum Nova is a high-performance alternative to Arbitrum One's chain. While Arbitrum One implements the purely trustless Rollup protocol, Arbitrum Nova implements the mostly trustless AnyTrust protocol. The key difference between Rollup and AnyTrust is that the AnyTrust protocol introduces an additional trust assumption in the form of a Data Availability Committee (DAC). This committee (detailed below) is responsible for expediting the process of storing, batching, and posting child chain transaction data to Ethereum's parent chain. This lets you use Arbitrum in scenarios that demand performance and affordability, while Arbitrum One is optimal for scenarios that demand Ethereum's pure trustlessness.