- Compare
- Celo vs Arbitrum Nova
Celo vs Arbitrum Nova Scalability
Real-time TPS
Celo TPS is 30.72 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Celo max TPS is 268.1 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Celo max theoretical TPS is 476.2 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Transaction Volume
Celo transaction volume is 110,599 txns, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Block Time
Celo block time is 1s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Finality
Celo finality is 24m 48s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Type
Celo is a layer 2 blockchain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Launch Date
Celo was launched on Apr 22, 2020, while the Arbitrum Nova has no data
Celo vs Arbitrum Nova Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Celo Nakamoto Coefficient is 1, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Validators/Miners
Celo has 1 validators, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Stake/Hashrate
Celo and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Celo is Rollup (Optimistic), while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Governance
Celo governance is on-chain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Other Comparisons
Celo Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Celo
Celo stands as a blockchain ecosystem with a mission to foster cryptocurrency adoption among smartphone users globally. Utilizing phone numbers as public keys, Celo aims to onboard billions of smartphone owners, including those lacking traditional banking access, into cryptocurrency transactions. The platform is engineered to offer a comprehensive range of stablecoins, decentralized identification solutions, and other resources, empowering both users and developers alike.
About Arbitrum Nova
Arbitrum Nova is a high-performance alternative to Arbitrum One's chain. While Arbitrum One implements the purely trustless Rollup protocol, Arbitrum Nova implements the mostly trustless AnyTrust protocol. The key difference between Rollup and AnyTrust is that the AnyTrust protocol introduces an additional trust assumption in the form of a Data Availability Committee (DAC). This committee (detailed below) is responsible for expediting the process of storing, batching, and posting child chain transaction data to Ethereum's parent chain. This lets you use Arbitrum in scenarios that demand performance and affordability, while Arbitrum One is optimal for scenarios that demand Ethereum's pure trustlessness.