Algorand 
Aptos 
Arbitrum 
Base 
Bitcoin 
BNB Chain 
BSV Blockchain 
Cardano 
Cronos 
eCash 
Ethereum 
Etherlink 
Fogo 
Hedera 
ICP 
IoTeX 
Kaia 
Keeta Mainnet 
Keeta Testnet 
Kusama 
Moonbeam 
MultiversX 
NEAR 
Optimism 
Polkadot 
Polygon 
Redbelly 
Sei 
Solana 
Somnia 
Sonic 
Stellar 
Sui 
Tezos 
Tezos Ecosystem 
TON 
TRON 
Wanchain 
Waterfall 
Abstract 
Aurora 
Avail 
B² Network 
Babylon 
Boba Network 
Chromia 
Cosmos 
Flare 
Gravity 
Hyperliquid 
Immutable X 
Immutable zkEVM 
Injective 
Ink 
Katana 
Kava 
Lens Chain 
Linea 
Lisk 
Manta Network 
Mantle 
MegaETH 
Metis 
Monad 
N1 
Neo 
Noble 
Particle 
Plume 
Quai Network 
RISE 
Ronin 
Skale 
Solayer 
Soon 
Sophon 
Supra 
Taiko 
Trac Network 
Unichain 
UPCX 
VeChain 
XDC Network 
XRP Ledger Compare Avalanche vs Starknet
Open in ChatGPTAvalanche vs Starknet Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Avalanche TPS is 10X higher than Starknet TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Avalanche max TPS is 36.76% lower than Starknet max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Avalanche max theoretical TPS is 1.2X higher than Starknet max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Avalanche transaction volume is 10X higher than Starknet transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Avalanche block time is 63.24% shorter than Starknet block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Avalanche finality is 99.97% shorter than Starknet finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Avalanche is a layer 1 blockchain, while Starknet is a layer 2 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
Avalanche has 4.5X more total transactions than Starknet
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Avalanche was launched 1 year before Starknet
Data from Chainspect
Avalanche vs Starknet Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Avalanche Nakamoto Coefficient is 27X higher than Starknet Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Avalanche has 671X more validators than Starknet
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Avalanche stake is $1.492B, while Starknet has no data
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Avalanche is PoS, while Starknet is Rollup (ZK)
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Avalanche and Starknet governance are both on-chain
Data from Chainspect
Avalanche vs Starknet Developer Activity
Developers
Avalanche has 2.12X more developers than Starknet
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Avalanche has 4.72X more commits than Starknet
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Avalanche has 3.97X more repos than Starknet
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Avalanche has 2.01X more stars than Starknet
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Avalanche has 6.94X more watchers than Starknet
Data from Chainspect
Avalanche vs Starknet Financials New
Chain Revenue
Avalanche chain revenue is 60.58% lower than Starknet chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Avalanche average transaction fee is 94.11% lower than Starknet average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Avalanche market cap is 13X higher than Starknet market cap
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Avalanche FDV is 14X higher than Starknet FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Avalanche Market Cap to FDV ratio is 3.94% lower than Starknet Market Cap to FDV ratio
Data from Chainspect
Price
Avalanche price is 193X higher than Starknet price
Data from Chainspect
Avalanche vs Starknet Real-time TPS Chart
Other Comparisons
Avalanche Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Avalanche
Avalanche emerges as a rapid, scalable blockchain platform facilitating the seamless creation and deployment of dApps. Distinguished by its unique consensus mechanism, it's particularly good for DeFi applications, allowing high throughput and nearly instant finality. Its architecture allows for a network of interconnected blockchains, each safeguarded by dynamic subsets of validators, ensuring scalability while maintaining speed, reliability, and security.
About Starknet
Starknet stands as a permissionless blockchain solution, functioning as a Validity-Rollup, often referred to as a zero-knowledge rollup (ZK rollup) for Ethereum. It's a Layer 2 (L2) platform that empowers dApps to achieve significant computational scalability while upholding Ethereum's inherent composability and security standards.