Get listed on Chainspect

Compare Arbitrum vs Waterfall

Arbitrum vs Waterfall TPS, Transactions, Finality Time

Real-time TPS (1H)

Arbitrum TPS is 11.23 tx/s, while Waterfall TPS is 0 tx/s

Arbitrum logo
11.23 tx/s
Waterfall logo
0 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Arbitrum max TPS is 97.56% lower than Waterfall max TPS

Arbitrum logo
2,036 tx/s
Waterfall logo
83,333 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Theoretical TPS

Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 85.37% lower than Waterfall max theoretical TPS

Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s
Waterfall logo
41,666 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Arbitrum transaction volume is 40.4K txns, while Waterfall transaction volume is 0 txns

Arbitrum logo
40.4K txns
Waterfall logo
0 txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Arbitrum block time is 299ms, while Waterfall block time is 0s

Arbitrum logo
299ms
Waterfall logo
0s

Data from Chainspect

Finality Time

Arbitrum finality is 35X longer than Waterfall finality

Arbitrum logo
13m 48s
Waterfall logo
24s

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

Arbitrum has 71X more total transactions than Waterfall

Arbitrum logo
2.42B txns
Waterfall logo
34.1M txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Arbitrum was launched 3 years before Waterfall

Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021
Waterfall logo
Jul 17, 2024

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Waterfall Nakamoto Coefficient

Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Waterfall Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum logo
1
Waterfall logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators

Arbitrum has 75% fewer validators than Waterfall

Arbitrum logo
1
Waterfall logo
4

Data from Chainspect

Stake

Arbitrum and Waterfall have no data

Arbitrum logo
—
Waterfall logo
—

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Waterfall is PoS

Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)
Waterfall logo
Proof of Stake (PoS)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Arbitrum on-chain governance is better than Waterfall council governance

Arbitrum logo
On-chain
Waterfall logo
Council

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Waterfall Developer Activity

Developers

Arbitrum has 3.15X more developers than Waterfall

Arbitrum logo
2,487
Waterfall logo
790

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Arbitrum has 9.33X more commits than Waterfall

Arbitrum logo
219,934
Waterfall logo
23,574

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Arbitrum has 9.71X more repos than Waterfall

Arbitrum logo
136
Waterfall logo
14

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Arbitrum has 3,622X more stars than Waterfall

Arbitrum logo
10,866
Waterfall logo
3

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Arbitrum has 728X more watchers than Waterfall

Arbitrum logo
1,455
Waterfall logo
2

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Waterfall Fees & Market Cap

On-Chain Revenue (1D)

Arbitrum on-chain revenue is $14.3K, while Waterfall has no data

Arbitrum logo
$14.3K
Waterfall logo
—

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee (1D)

Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.0143, while Waterfall has no data

Arbitrum logo
$0.0143
Waterfall logo
—

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Arbitrum market cap is $1.07B, while Waterfall has no data

Arbitrum logo
$1.07B
Waterfall logo
—

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Arbitrum FDV is $1.56B, while Waterfall has no data

Arbitrum logo
$1.56B
Waterfall logo
—

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 68.92%, while Waterfall has no data

Arbitrum logo
68.92%
Waterfall logo
—

Data from Chainspect

Price

Arbitrum price is $0.1555, while Waterfall has no data

Arbitrum logo
$0.1555
Waterfall logo
—

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Waterfall Real-time TPS Chart

Be first to know when a chain makes its move. Live alerts on our X, daily

Follow on X