- Compare
- Arbitrum vs Waterfall
Arbitrum vs Waterfall Scalability
Real-time TPS
Arbitrum TPS is 352X higher than Waterfall TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 89.29% lower than Waterfall max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 3X higher than Waterfall max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Arbitrum transaction volume is 352X higher than Waterfall transaction volume
Block Time
Arbitrum block time is 98.19% shorter than Waterfall block time
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 35X longer than Waterfall finality
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Waterfall is a layer 1 blockchain
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched 3 years before Waterfall
Arbitrum vs Waterfall Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1, while Waterfall has no data
Validators
Arbitrum has 99.99% fewer validators than Waterfall
Stake
Arbitrum has no data, while Waterfall stake is $279K
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Waterfall is PoS
Governance
Arbitrum on-chain governance is better than Waterfall council governance
Arbitrum vs Waterfall Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About Waterfall
Waterfall is a highly scalable and decentralized BlockDAG EVM-compatible Layer 1 protocol. Low transaction fees and EVM compatibility make Waterfall the platform of choice for Dapps.