Compare Arbitrum vs Waterfall

Arbitrum TPS is 33X higher than Waterfall TPS

10.17 tx/s

0.31 tx/s

Arbitrum max TPS is 93.72% lower than Waterfall max TPS

2,036 tx/s

32,434 tx/s

Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 85.37% lower than Waterfall max theoretical TPS

6,095 tx/s

41,666 tx/s

Arbitrum transaction volume is 33X higher than Waterfall transaction volume

36.6K txns

1.1K txns

Arbitrum block time is 92.8% shorter than Waterfall block time

251ms

3.49s

Arbitrum finality is 35X longer than Waterfall finality

13m 48s

24s

Arbitrum has 75X more total transactions than Waterfall

2.31B txns

30.6M txns

Arbitrum was launched 3 years before Waterfall

Aug 31, 2021

Jul 17, 2024

Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Waterfall Nakamoto Coefficient

1

1

Arbitrum has 75% fewer validators than Waterfall

1

4

Arbitrum and Waterfall have no data

—

—

Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Waterfall is PoS

Rollup (Optimistic)

Proof of Stake (PoS)

Arbitrum on-chain governance is better than Waterfall council governance

On-chain

Council

Arbitrum has 3.11X more developers than Waterfall

2,461

791

Arbitrum has 8.52X more commits than Waterfall

200,551

23,540

Arbitrum has 9.43X more repos than Waterfall

132

14

Arbitrum has 3,603X more stars than Waterfall

10,809

3

Arbitrum has 742X more watchers than Waterfall

1,484

2

Arbitrum on-chain revenue is $7.644K, while Waterfall has no data

$7.644K

—

Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.006963, while Waterfall has no data

$0.006963

—

Arbitrum market cap is $494.1M, while Waterfall has no data

$494.1M

—

Arbitrum FDV is $747M, while Waterfall has no data

$747M

—

Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 66.14%, while Waterfall has no data

66.14%

—

Arbitrum price is $0.0747, while Waterfall has no data

$0.0747

—