Compare Arbitrum vs Waterfall
Open in ChatGPTArbitrum vs Waterfall Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Arbitrum TPS is 139X higher than Waterfall TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 93.72% lower than Waterfall max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 85.37% lower than Waterfall max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Arbitrum transaction volume is 139X higher than Waterfall transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Arbitrum block time is 92.89% shorter than Waterfall block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 35X longer than Waterfall finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Waterfall is a layer 1 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
Arbitrum has 77X more total transactions than Waterfall
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched 3 years before Waterfall
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Waterfall Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1, while Waterfall has no data
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Arbitrum has 99.99% fewer validators than Waterfall
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Arbitrum has no data, while Waterfall stake is $1.228M
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Waterfall is PoS
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Arbitrum on-chain governance is better than Waterfall council governance
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Waterfall Developer Activity
Developers
Arbitrum has 183X more developers than Waterfall
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Arbitrum has 791X more commits than Waterfall
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Arbitrum has 16X more repos than Waterfall
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Arbitrum has 3,562X more stars than Waterfall
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Arbitrum has 806X more watchers than Waterfall
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Waterfall Financials New
Chain Revenue
Arbitrum chain revenue is 937,515X higher than Waterfall chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Arbitrum average transaction fee is 6,794X higher than Waterfall average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Arbitrum market cap is $566M, while Waterfall has no data
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Arbitrum FDV is 125X higher than Waterfall FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 58.27%, while Waterfall has no data
Data from Chainspect
Price
Arbitrum price is 323X higher than Waterfall price
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Waterfall Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About Waterfall
Waterfall is a highly scalable and decentralized BlockDAG EVM-compatible Layer 1 protocol. Low transaction fees and EVM compatibility make Waterfall the platform of choice for Dapps.