Arbitrum vs TON

Arbitrum vs TON Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Arbitrum TPS is 1.05X higher than TON TPS

Arbitrum logo
30.43 tx/s
TON logo
28.95 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Arbitrum max TPS is 11.92% lower than TON max TPS

Arbitrum logo
1,358 tx/s
TON logo
1,542 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 61.8% lower than TON max theoretical TPS

Arbitrum logo
40,000 tx/s
TON logo
104,715 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Arbitrum transaction volume is 1.05X higher than TON transaction volume

Arbitrum logo
110K txns
TON logo
104K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Arbitrum block time is 90.39% shorter than TON block time

Arbitrum logo
0.25s
TON logo
2.6s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Arbitrum finality is 138X longer than TON finality

Arbitrum logo
13m 48s
TON logo
6s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while TON is a layer 1 blockchain

Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain
TON logo
Layer 1 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

New

Total Transactions

Arbitrum has 41.41% fewer total transactions than TON

Arbitrum logo
1.57B txns
TON logo
2.67B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Arbitrum was launched 3 months after TON

Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021
TON logo
May 26, 2021

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs TON Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 98.82% lower than TON Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum logo
1
TON logo
85

Data from Chainspect

Validators

Arbitrum has 99.75% fewer validators than TON

Arbitrum logo
1
TON logo
401

Data from Chainspect

Stake

Arbitrum has no data, while TON stake is $1.253B

Arbitrum logo
—
TON logo
$1.253B

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while TON is PoS

Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)
TON logo
Proof of Stake (PoS)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Arbitrum and TON governance are both on-chain

Arbitrum logo
On-chain
TON logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs TON Developer Activity New

Developers

Arbitrum has 8.78X more developers than TON

Arbitrum logo
2,317
TON logo
264

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Arbitrum has 1.64X more repos than TON

Arbitrum logo
126
TON logo
77

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Arbitrum has 19X more commits than TON

Arbitrum logo
185,174
TON logo
9,610

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Arbitrum has 1.01X more stars than TON

Arbitrum logo
10,340
TON logo
10,283

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Arbitrum has 1.7X more watchers than TON

Arbitrum logo
1,714
TON logo
1,008

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs TON Real-Time TPS Chart

Loading Data

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

About TON

The Open Network (TON) is a decentralized and open internet platform made up of several components. These include: TON Blockchain, TON DNS, TON Storage, and TON Sites. TON Blockchain is the core protocol that connects TON’s underlying infrastructure together to form the greater TON Ecosystem. TON is focused on achieving widespread cross-chain interoperability, while operating in a highly scalable secure framework. TON is designed to process millions of transactions per second (TPS), with the goal of eventually reaching hundreds of millions of users moving forward.

Blockchains Socials

Arbitrum Socials

TON Socials