Compare Arbitrum vs TON

Arbitrum TPS is 56.95% lower than TON TPS

11.08 tx/s

25.74 tx/s

Arbitrum max TPS is 1.32X higher than TON max TPS

2,036 tx/s

1,542 tx/s

Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 94.18% lower than TON max theoretical TPS

6,095 tx/s

104,715 tx/s

Arbitrum transaction volume is 56.95% lower than TON transaction volume

39.9K txns

92.6K txns

Arbitrum block time is 31.53% shorter than TON block time

292ms

427ms

Arbitrum finality is 1,035X longer than TON finality

13m 48s

800ms

Arbitrum has 33.08% fewer total transactions than TON

2.4B txns

3.59B txns

Arbitrum was launched 3 months after TON

Aug 31, 2021

May 26, 2021

Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 98.78% lower than TON Nakamoto Coefficient

1

82

Arbitrum has 99.74% fewer validators than TON

1

381

Arbitrum has no data, while TON stake is $915M

—

$915M

Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while TON is PoS

Rollup (Optimistic)

Proof of Stake (PoS)

Arbitrum and TON governance are both on-chain

On-chain

On-chain

Arbitrum has 3.98X more developers than TON

2,486

625

Arbitrum has 6.34X more commits than TON

219,528

34,608

Arbitrum has 31.09% fewer repos than TON

133

193

Arbitrum has 37.9% fewer stars than TON

10,857

17,483

Arbitrum has 13.9% fewer watchers than TON

1,462

1,698

Arbitrum on-chain revenue is 8.98X higher than TON on-chain revenue

$19.1K

$2.12K

Arbitrum average transaction fee is 20X higher than TON average transaction fee

$0.0116

$0.000583

Arbitrum market cap is 65.71% lower than TON market cap

$1.3B

$3.8B

Arbitrum FDV is 73.26% lower than TON FDV

$1.89B

$7.07B

Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 1.28X higher than TON Market Cap to FDV ratio

68.92%

53.74%

Arbitrum price is 85.91% lower than TON price

$0.1891

$1.34