Get listed on Chainspect

Compare Arbitrum vs TON

Arbitrum vs TON TPS, Transactions, Finality Time

Real-time TPS (1H)

Arbitrum TPS is 74.67% lower than TON TPS

Arbitrum logo
13.43 tx/s
TON logo
53 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Arbitrum max TPS is 1.32X higher than TON max TPS

Arbitrum logo
2,036 tx/s
TON logo
1,542 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Theoretical TPS

Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 94.17% lower than TON max theoretical TPS

Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s
TON logo
104,715 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Arbitrum transaction volume is 74.67% lower than TON transaction volume

Arbitrum logo
48.3K txns
TON logo
191K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Arbitrum block time is 37.43% shorter than TON block time

Arbitrum logo
251ms
TON logo
401ms

Data from Chainspect

Finality Time

Arbitrum finality is 1,035X longer than TON finality

Arbitrum logo
13m 48s
TON logo
800ms

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

Arbitrum has 31.65% fewer total transactions than TON

Arbitrum logo
2.32B txns
TON logo
3.39B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Arbitrum was launched 3 months after TON

Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021
TON logo
May 26, 2021

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs TON Nakamoto Coefficient

Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 98.8% lower than TON Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum logo
1
TON logo
84

Data from Chainspect

Validators

Arbitrum has 99.73% fewer validators than TON

Arbitrum logo
1
TON logo
382

Data from Chainspect

Stake

Arbitrum has no data, while TON stake is $960.6M

Arbitrum logo
TON logo
$960.6M

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while TON is PoS

Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)
TON logo
Proof of Stake (PoS)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Arbitrum and TON governance are both on-chain

Arbitrum logo
On-chain
TON logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs TON Developer Activity

Developers

Arbitrum has 3.97X more developers than TON

Arbitrum logo
2,461
TON logo
620

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Arbitrum has 6.07X more commits than TON

Arbitrum logo
200,787
TON logo
33,079

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Arbitrum has 29.78% fewer repos than TON

Arbitrum logo
132
TON logo
188

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Arbitrum has 36.43% fewer stars than TON

Arbitrum logo
10,811
TON logo
17,008

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Arbitrum has 7.49% fewer watchers than TON

Arbitrum logo
1,482
TON logo
1,602

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs TON Fees & Market Cap

On-Chain Revenue

Arbitrum on-chain revenue is 4.6X higher than TON on-chain revenue

Arbitrum logo
$19.73K
TON logo
$4.291K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Arbitrum average transaction fee is 9.14X higher than TON average transaction fee

Arbitrum logo
$0.009395
TON logo
$0.001028

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Arbitrum market cap is 83.77% lower than TON market cap

Arbitrum logo
$668M
TON logo
$4.117B

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Arbitrum FDV is 87.18% lower than TON FDV

Arbitrum logo
$1B
TON logo
$7.803B

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 1.27X higher than TON Market Cap to FDV ratio

Arbitrum logo
66.78%
TON logo
52.76%

Data from Chainspect

Price

Arbitrum price is 93.28% lower than TON price

Arbitrum logo
$0.1
TON logo
$1.49

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs TON Real-time TPS Chart

Follow us on X for ATH alerts, TPS spikes and major announcements

Follow