Compare Arbitrum vs TON
Open in ChatGPTArbitrum vs TON Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Arbitrum TPS is 31.8% lower than TON TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 1.32X higher than TON max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 94.17% lower than TON max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Arbitrum transaction volume is 31.8% lower than TON transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Arbitrum block time is 38.61% shorter than TON block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 1,035X longer than TON finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while TON is a layer 1 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
Arbitrum has 31.14% fewer total transactions than TON
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched 3 months after TON
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs TON Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 98.79% lower than TON Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Arbitrum has 99.74% fewer validators than TON
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Arbitrum has no data, while TON stake is $1.204B
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while TON is PoS
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Arbitrum and TON governance are both on-chain
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs TON Developer Activity
Developers
Arbitrum has 4.05X more developers than TON
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Arbitrum has 6.43X more commits than TON
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Arbitrum has 30.81% fewer repos than TON
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Arbitrum has 34.82% fewer stars than TON
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Arbitrum has 3.76% fewer watchers than TON
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs TON Financials New
Chain Revenue
Arbitrum chain revenue is 3.03X higher than TON chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Arbitrum average transaction fee is 6.84X higher than TON average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Arbitrum market cap is 88.43% lower than TON market cap
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Arbitrum FDV is 90.48% lower than TON FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 1.22X higher than TON Market Cap to FDV ratio
Data from Chainspect
Price
Arbitrum price is 95.06% lower than TON price
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs TON Real-time TPS Chart
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About TON
The Open Network (TON) is a decentralized and open internet platform made up of several components. These include: TON Blockchain, TON DNS, TON Storage, and TON Sites. TON Blockchain is the core protocol that connects TON’s underlying infrastructure together to form the greater TON Ecosystem. TON is focused on achieving widespread cross-chain interoperability, while operating in a highly scalable secure framework. TON is designed to process millions of transactions per second (TPS), with the goal of eventually reaching hundreds of millions of users moving forward.