Compare Arbitrum vs TON

Arbitrum vs TON Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Arbitrum TPS is 3.75X higher than TON TPS

Arbitrum logo
49 tx/s
TON logo
13.06 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Arbitrum max TPS is 11.92% lower than TON max TPS

Arbitrum logo
1,358 tx/s
TON logo
1,542 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 61.8% lower than TON max theoretical TPS

Arbitrum logo
40,000 tx/s
TON logo
104,715 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Arbitrum transaction volume is 3.75X higher than TON transaction volume

Arbitrum logo
176K txns
TON logo
47K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Arbitrum block time is 91.73% shorter than TON block time

Arbitrum logo
0.25s
TON logo
3.02s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Arbitrum finality is 138X longer than TON finality

Arbitrum logo
13m 48s
TON logo
6s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while TON is a layer 1 blockchain

Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain
TON logo
Layer 1 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

New

Total Transactions

Arbitrum has 39.76% fewer total transactions than TON

Arbitrum logo
1.63B txns
TON logo
2.71B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Arbitrum was launched 3 months after TON

Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021
TON logo
May 26, 2021

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs TON Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 98.79% lower than TON Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum logo
1
TON logo
83

Data from Chainspect

Validators

Arbitrum has 99.74% fewer validators than TON

Arbitrum logo
1
TON logo
386

Data from Chainspect

Stake

Arbitrum has no data, while TON stake is $892.9M

Arbitrum logo
—
TON logo
$892.9M

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while TON is PoS

Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)
TON logo
Proof of Stake (PoS)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Arbitrum and TON governance are both on-chain

Arbitrum logo
On-chain
TON logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs TON Developer Activity New

Developers

Arbitrum has 4.23X more developers than TON

Arbitrum logo
2,325
TON logo
549

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Arbitrum has 24.26% fewer repos than TON

Arbitrum logo
128
TON logo
169

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Arbitrum has 9.08X more commits than TON

Arbitrum logo
188,398
TON logo
20,754

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Arbitrum has 28.04% fewer stars than TON

Arbitrum logo
10,414
TON logo
14,472

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Arbitrum has 1.1X more watchers than TON

Arbitrum logo
1,619
TON logo
1,470

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs TON Real-Time TPS Chart

Loading Data

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

About TON

The Open Network (TON) is a decentralized and open internet platform made up of several components. These include: TON Blockchain, TON DNS, TON Storage, and TON Sites. TON Blockchain is the core protocol that connects TON’s underlying infrastructure together to form the greater TON Ecosystem. TON is focused on achieving widespread cross-chain interoperability, while operating in a highly scalable secure framework. TON is designed to process millions of transactions per second (TPS), with the goal of eventually reaching hundreds of millions of users moving forward.

Blockchains Socials

Arbitrum Socials

TON Socials