Arbitrum vs Starknet Scalability
Real-time TPS
Arbitrum TPS is 21X higher than Starknet TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 2.9X higher than Starknet max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 168X higher than Starknet max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Arbitrum transaction volume is 21X higher than Starknet transaction volume
Block Time
Arbitrum block time is 98.88% shorter than Starknet block time
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 89.6% shorter than Starknet finality
Type
Arbitrum and Starknet are both layer 2 blockchains
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched 3 months before Starknet
Arbitrum vs Starknet Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Starknet Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Arbitrum and Starknet have the same amount of validators
Stake
Arbitrum and Starknet have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Starknet is Rollup (ZK)
Governance
Arbitrum and Starknet governance are both on-chain
Arbitrum vs Starknet Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
Starknet Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About Starknet
Starknet stands as a permissionless blockchain solution, functioning as a Validity-Rollup, often referred to as a zero-knowledge rollup (ZK rollup) for Ethereum. It's a Layer 2 (L2) platform that empowers dApps to achieve significant computational scalability while upholding Ethereum's inherent composability and security standards.