Real-time TPS
Arbitrum TPS is 3.33X more than Starknet TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 2.9X more than Starknet max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 168X more than Starknet max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Arbitrum transaction volume is 3.33X more than Starknet transaction volume
Block Time
Arbitrum block time is 98.52% less than Starknet block time
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 89.6% less than Starknet finality
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum and Starknet nakamoto coefficient are both coming soon
Active Addresses
Arbitrum and Starknet active addresses are both coming soon
Governance
Arbitrum and Starknet governance are both on-chain
Type
Arbitrum and Starknet are both layer 2 blockchains
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched 3 months before Starknet
Arbitrum vs Starknet Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
Starknet Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About Starknet
Starknet stands as a permissionless blockchain solution, functioning as a Validity-Rollup, often referred to as a zero-knowledge rollup (ZK rollup) for Ethereum. It's a Layer 2 (L2) platform that empowers dApps to achieve significant computational scalability while upholding Ethereum's inherent composability and security standards.