Compare Arbitrum vs Sonic
Open in ChatGPTArbitrum vs Sonic Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Arbitrum TPS is 21X higher than Sonic TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 1.23X higher than Sonic max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 98.46% lower than Sonic max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Arbitrum transaction volume is 21X higher than Sonic transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Arbitrum block time is 77.07% shorter than Sonic block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 100% longer than Sonic finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Sonic is a layer 1 blockchain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions
Arbitrum has 11X more total transactions than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched 3 years before Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Sonic Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 75% lower than Sonic Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Arbitrum has 97.43% fewer validators than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Arbitrum has no data, while Sonic stake is $127.9M
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Sonic is PoS
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Arbitrum and Sonic governance are both on-chain
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Sonic Developer Activity
Developers
Arbitrum has 23X more developers than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Arbitrum has 9.92X more repos than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Arbitrum has 14X more commits than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Arbitrum has 128X more stars than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Arbitrum has 19X more watchers than Sonic
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Sonic Financials New
Chain Revenue
Arbitrum chain revenue is 110X higher than Sonic chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Arbitrum average transaction fee is 5.36X higher than Sonic average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Arbitrum market cap is 4.16X higher than Sonic market cap
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Arbitrum FDV is 6.61X higher than Sonic FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 37.13% lower than Sonic Market Cap to FDV ratio
Data from Chainspect
Price
Arbitrum price is 2.13X higher than Sonic price
Data from Chainspect
Arbitrum vs Sonic Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About Sonic
Sonic is the highest-performing EVM layer-1 blockchain, combining speed, incentives, and world-class infrastructure, powering the next generation of DeFi applications. The chain provides 400,000 TPS and sub-second finality.
By combining a novel consensus mechanism with full EVM compatibility, Sonic delivers unparalleled speed, security, and scalability. The S token is Sonic's native token, used for paying transaction fees, staking, running validators, and participating in governance.