Arbitrum vs Sonic

Arbitrum vs Sonic Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Arbitrum TPS is 6.72X higher than Sonic TPS

Arbitrum logo
30.43 tx/s
Sonic logo
4.53 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Arbitrum max TPS is 1.19X higher than Sonic max TPS

Arbitrum logo
1,358 tx/s
Sonic logo
1,139 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 89.91% lower than Sonic max theoretical TPS

Arbitrum logo
40,000 tx/s
Sonic logo
396,825 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Arbitrum transaction volume is 6.72X higher than Sonic transaction volume

Arbitrum logo
110K txns
Sonic logo
16.3K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Arbitrum block time is 59.36% shorter than Sonic block time

Arbitrum logo
0.25s
Sonic logo
0.61s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Arbitrum finality is 100% longer than Sonic finality

Arbitrum logo
13m 48s
Sonic logo
0s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Sonic is a layer 1 blockchain

Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain
Sonic logo
Layer 1 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

New

Total Transactions

Arbitrum has 11X more total transactions than Sonic

Arbitrum logo
1.57B txns
Sonic logo
138M txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Arbitrum was launched 3 years before Sonic

Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021
Sonic logo
Dec 1, 2024

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Sonic Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 75% lower than Sonic Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum logo
1
Sonic logo
4

Data from Chainspect

Validators

Arbitrum has 97.56% fewer validators than Sonic

Arbitrum logo
1
Sonic logo
41

Data from Chainspect

Stake

Arbitrum has no data, while Sonic stake is $396.5M

Arbitrum logo
—
Sonic logo
$396.5M

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Sonic is PoS

Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)
Sonic logo
Proof of Stake (PoS)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Arbitrum and Sonic governance are both on-chain

Arbitrum logo
On-chain
Sonic logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Sonic Developer Activity New

Developers

Arbitrum has 23X more developers than Sonic

Arbitrum logo
2,317
Sonic logo
102

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Arbitrum has 11X more repos than Sonic

Arbitrum logo
126
Sonic logo
12

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Arbitrum has 13X more commits than Sonic

Arbitrum logo
185,174
Sonic logo
13,788

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Arbitrum has 144X more stars than Sonic

Arbitrum logo
10,340
Sonic logo
72

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Arbitrum has 20X more watchers than Sonic

Arbitrum logo
1,714
Sonic logo
84

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Sonic Real-Time TPS Chart

Loading Data

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

About Sonic

Sonic is the highest-performing EVM layer-1 blockchain, combining speed, incentives, and world-class infrastructure, powering the next generation of DeFi applications. The chain provides 400,000 TPS and sub-second finality.

By combining a novel consensus mechanism with full EVM compatibility, Sonic delivers unparalleled speed, security, and scalability. The S token is Sonic's native token, used for paying transaction fees, staking, running validators, and participating in governance.

Blockchains Socials

Arbitrum Socials

Sonic Socials