Advertise on Chainspect

Compare Arbitrum vs Etherlink

Arbitrum vs Etherlink TPS, Transactions, Finality Time

Real-time TPS (1H)

Arbitrum TPS is 26X higher than Etherlink TPS

Arbitrum logo
18.44 tx/s
Etherlink logo
0.7 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Arbitrum max TPS is 62X higher than Etherlink max TPS

Arbitrum logo
2,036 tx/s
Etherlink logo
32.76 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Theoretical TPS

Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 4.74X higher than Etherlink max theoretical TPS

Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s
Etherlink logo
1,286 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Arbitrum transaction volume is 26X higher than Etherlink transaction volume

Arbitrum logo
66.3K txns
Etherlink logo
2.51K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Arbitrum block time is 88.45% shorter than Etherlink block time

Arbitrum logo
250ms
Etherlink logo
2.17s

Data from Chainspect

Finality Time

Arbitrum finality is 46X longer than Etherlink finality

Arbitrum logo
13m 48s
Etherlink logo
18s

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

Arbitrum has 26X more total transactions than Etherlink

Arbitrum logo
2.31B txns
Etherlink logo
90.3M txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Arbitrum was launched 3 years before Etherlink

Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021
Etherlink logo
Feb 25, 2025

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Etherlink Nakamoto Coefficient

Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is the same as Etherlink Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum logo
1
Etherlink logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators

Arbitrum and Etherlink have the same amount of validators

Arbitrum logo
1
Etherlink logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake

Arbitrum and Etherlink have no data

Arbitrum logo
Etherlink logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Arbitrum and Etherlink are both Rollup (Optimistic)

Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)
Etherlink logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Arbitrum and Etherlink governance are both on-chain

Arbitrum logo
On-chain
Etherlink logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Etherlink Developer Activity

Developers

Arbitrum has 14X more developers than Etherlink

Arbitrum logo
2,461
Etherlink logo
177

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Arbitrum has 43X more commits than Etherlink

Arbitrum logo
200,551
Etherlink logo
4,689

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Arbitrum has 7.33X more repos than Etherlink

Arbitrum logo
132
Etherlink logo
18

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Arbitrum has 470X more stars than Etherlink

Arbitrum logo
10,811
Etherlink logo
23

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Arbitrum has 247X more watchers than Etherlink

Arbitrum logo
1,484
Etherlink logo
6

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Etherlink Fees & Market Cap

On-Chain Revenue

Arbitrum on-chain revenue is 231X higher than Etherlink on-chain revenue

Arbitrum logo
$5.749K
Etherlink logo
$24.91

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Arbitrum average transaction fee is 28X higher than Etherlink average transaction fee

Arbitrum logo
$0.006521
Etherlink logo
$0.0002289

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Arbitrum market cap is $478.3M, while Etherlink has no data

Arbitrum logo
$478.3M
Etherlink logo

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Arbitrum FDV is $723.2M, while Etherlink has no data

Arbitrum logo
$723.2M
Etherlink logo

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 66.14%, while Etherlink has no data

Arbitrum logo
66.14%
Etherlink logo

Data from Chainspect

Price

Arbitrum price is $0.07232, while Etherlink has no data

Arbitrum logo
$0.07232
Etherlink logo

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Etherlink Real-time TPS Chart

Follow us on X for ATH alerts, TPS spikes and major announcements

Follow