- Compare
- Arbitrum vs Aptos
Arbitrum vs Aptos Scalability
Real-time TPS
Arbitrum TPS is 40.34% lower than Aptos TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 89.49% lower than Aptos max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 75% lower than Aptos max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Arbitrum transaction volume is 40.34% lower than Aptos transaction volume
Block Time
Arbitrum block time is 2.37X longer than Aptos block time
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 100% longer than Aptos finality
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Aptos is a layer 1 blockchain
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched 1 year before Aptos
Arbitrum vs Aptos Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 94.44% lower than Aptos Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Arbitrum has 99.32% fewer validators than Aptos
Stake
Arbitrum has no data, while Aptos stake is $3.873B
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Aptos is PoS
Governance
Arbitrum and Aptos governance are both on-chain
Arbitrum vs Aptos Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About Aptos
Aptos is a Layer 1 blockchain platform focused on safety and scalability, driving growth within a decentralized network and developer ecosystem with the Move programming language.