- Compare
- Arbitrum vs Aptos
Arbitrum vs Aptos Scalability
Real-time TPS
Arbitrum TPS is 50.76% lower than Aptos TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 91.45% lower than Aptos max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 75% lower than Aptos max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Arbitrum transaction volume is 50.76% lower than Aptos transaction volume
Block Time
Arbitrum block time is 1.95X longer than Aptos block time
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 100% longer than Aptos finality
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Aptos is a layer 1 blockchain
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched 1 year before Aptos
Arbitrum vs Aptos Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 94.11% lower than Aptos Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Arbitrum has 99.32% fewer validators than Aptos
Stake
Arbitrum has no data, while Aptos stake is 882.1M APT
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Aptos is PoS
Governance
Arbitrum and Aptos governance are both on-chain
Arbitrum vs Aptos Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About Aptos
Aptos is a Layer 1 blockchain platform focused on safety and scalability, driving growth within a decentralized network and developer ecosystem with the Move programming language.