- Compare
- Aptos vs Polygon
Aptos vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
Aptos TPS is 16% lower than Polygon TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Aptos max TPS is 30X higher than Polygon max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Aptos max theoretical TPS is 224X higher than Polygon max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Aptos transaction volume is 16% lower than Polygon transaction volume
Block Time
Aptos block time is 94.54% shorter than Polygon block time
Finality
Aptos finality is 100% shorter than Polygon finality
Type
Aptos is a layer 1 blockchain, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
Aptos was launched 2 years after Polygon
Aptos vs Polygon Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Aptos Nakamoto Coefficient is 4.5X higher than Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Aptos has 1.43X more validators than Polygon
Stake
Aptos stake is 4.89X higher than Polygon stake
Consensus Mechanism
Aptos and Polygon are both PoS
Governance
Aptos on-chain governance is better than Polygon off-chain governance
Aptos vs Polygon Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Aptos Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Aptos
Aptos is a Layer 1 blockchain platform focused on safety and scalability, driving growth within a decentralized network and developer ecosystem with the Move programming language.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.