Acurast vs Abstract Scalability
Real-time TPS
Acurast and Abstract have no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Acurast and Abstract have no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Acurast and Abstract have no data
Transaction Volume
Acurast and Abstract have no data
Block Time
Acurast and Abstract have no data
Finality
Acurast and Abstract have no data
Type
Acurast and Abstract have no data
Launch Date
Acurast and Abstract have no data
Acurast vs Abstract Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Acurast and Abstract have no data
Miners
Acurast and Abstract have no data
Hashrate
Acurast and Abstract have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Acurast and Abstract have no data
Governance
Acurast and Abstract have no data
Other Comparisons
Acurast Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Acurast
Acurast, disrupting the cloud monopoly with mobile hardware, democratizing and decentralizing the cloud. Where everyone can become part of the decentralized Cloud with their mobile phone. Giving developers complete permisionless access to compute that is trustless, affordable and confidential.
About Abstract
Abstract is a Layer 2 (L2) network built on top of Ethereum, designed to securely power consumer-facing blockchain applications at scale with low fees and fast transaction speeds.
Built on top of the ZK Stack, Abstract is a zero-knowledge (ZK) rollup built to be a more scalable alternative to Ethereum; it achieves this scalability by executing transactions off-chain, batching them together, and verifying batches of transactions on Ethereum using (ZK) proofs.
Abstract is EVM compatible, meaning it looks and feels like Ethereum, but with lower gas fees and higher transaction throughput. Existing smart contracts built for Ethereum will work out of the box on Abstract (with some differences), meaning developers can easily port applications to Abstract with no or minimal changes.