- Compare
- Tron vs Arbitrum Nova
Tron vs Arbitrum Nova Scalability
Real-time TPS
Tron TPS is 72.96 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Tron max TPS is 272 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Tron max theoretical TPS is 2,516 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Transaction Volume
Tron transaction volume is 262,668 txns, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Block Time
Tron block time is 3s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Finality
Tron finality is 57s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Type
Tron is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Launch Date
Tron was launched on Jun 25, 2018, while the Arbitrum Nova has no data
Tron vs Arbitrum Nova Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Tron Nakamoto Coefficient is 5, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Validators/Miners
Tron has 27 validators, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Stake/Hashrate
Tron stake is $14.96B, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Tron is PoS, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Governance
Tron governance is on-chain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Other Comparisons
Tron Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Tron
Tron is a blockchain platform focused on decentralized entertainment and content distribution. It offers high throughput, supports dApps, and uses the TRX token for transactions and governance. Tron aims to disrupt traditional entertainment industries by providing a platform for content creators to distribute and monetize their content directly to consumers.
About Arbitrum Nova
Arbitrum Nova is a high-performance alternative to Arbitrum One's chain. While Arbitrum One implements the purely trustless Rollup protocol, Arbitrum Nova implements the mostly trustless AnyTrust protocol. The key difference between Rollup and AnyTrust is that the AnyTrust protocol introduces an additional trust assumption in the form of a Data Availability Committee (DAC). This committee (detailed below) is responsible for expediting the process of storing, batching, and posting child chain transaction data to Ethereum's parent chain. This lets you use Arbitrum in scenarios that demand performance and affordability, while Arbitrum One is optimal for scenarios that demand Ethereum's pure trustlessness.