Telos vs Arbitrum Nova Scalability
Real-time TPS
Telos TPS is 0.68 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Telos max TPS is 13.3 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Telos max theoretical TPS is 15,200 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Transaction Volume
Telos transaction volume is 2,465 txns, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Block Time
Telos block time is 0.5s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Finality
Telos finality is 2m 6s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Type
Telos is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Launch Date
Telos was launched on Dec 12, 2018, while the Arbitrum Nova has no data
Telos vs Arbitrum Nova Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Telos Nakamoto Coefficient is 8, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Validators/Miners
Telos has 45 validators, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Stake/Hashrate
Telos stake is $4.082M, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Telos is PoS, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Governance
Telos governance is on-chain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Other Comparisons
Telos Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Telos
Telos is a blockchain platform built on EOSIO software, focusing on governance, scalability, and sustainability. It features transparent governance allowing token holders to participate in decision-making. With advanced resource management and a Delegated Proof-of-Stake consensus, Telos achieves high scalability. It emphasizes environmental consciousness and fosters a strong community of developers and users.
About Arbitrum Nova
Arbitrum Nova is a high-performance alternative to Arbitrum One's chain. While Arbitrum One implements the purely trustless Rollup protocol, Arbitrum Nova implements the mostly trustless AnyTrust protocol. The key difference between Rollup and AnyTrust is that the AnyTrust protocol introduces an additional trust assumption in the form of a Data Availability Committee (DAC). This committee (detailed below) is responsible for expediting the process of storing, batching, and posting child chain transaction data to Ethereum's parent chain. This lets you use Arbitrum in scenarios that demand performance and affordability, while Arbitrum One is optimal for scenarios that demand Ethereum's pure trustlessness.