- Compare
- QFnetwork vs Arbitrum Nova
QFnetwork vs Arbitrum Nova Scalability
Real-time TPS
QFnetwork and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
QFnetwork and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Max Theoretical TPS
QFnetwork and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Transaction Volume
QFnetwork and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Block Time
QFnetwork and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Finality
QFnetwork and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Type
QFnetwork and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Launch Date
QFnetwork and Arbitrum Nova have no data
QFnetwork vs Arbitrum Nova Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
QFnetwork and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Miners
QFnetwork and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Hashrate
QFnetwork and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Consensus Mechanism
QFnetwork and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Governance
QFnetwork and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Other Comparisons
QFnetwork Comparisons
About Blockchains
About QFnetwork
QFnetwork merges cutting-edge technologies to revolutionize blockchain, by integrating advanced consensus protocols, parallel execution, innovative storage solutions and more. Delivering unparalleled speed, scalability, and developer-friendly tools. QF network is here to break the barriers that have held dApps back from mass adoption.
About Arbitrum Nova
Arbitrum Nova is a high-performance alternative to Arbitrum One's chain. While Arbitrum One implements the purely trustless Rollup protocol, Arbitrum Nova implements the mostly trustless AnyTrust protocol. The key difference between Rollup and AnyTrust is that the AnyTrust protocol introduces an additional trust assumption in the form of a Data Availability Committee (DAC). This committee (detailed below) is responsible for expediting the process of storing, batching, and posting child chain transaction data to Ethereum's parent chain. This lets you use Arbitrum in scenarios that demand performance and affordability, while Arbitrum One is optimal for scenarios that demand Ethereum's pure trustlessness.