- Compare
- Polkadex vs Arbitrum Nova
Polkadex vs Arbitrum Nova Scalability
Real-time TPS
Polkadex TPS is 0 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Polkadex max TPS is 0.79 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Polkadex max theoretical TPS is 1,500 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Transaction Volume
Polkadex transaction volume is 0 txns, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Block Time
Polkadex block time is 12s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Finality
Polkadex finality is 30s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Type
Polkadex is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Launch Date
Polkadex was launched on Sep 26, 2021, while the Arbitrum Nova has no data
Polkadex vs Arbitrum Nova Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Polkadex and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Validators/Miners
Polkadex and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Stake/Hashrate
Polkadex and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Polkadex is PoS, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Governance
Polkadex governance is on-chain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Other Comparisons
Polkadex Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Polkadex
Polkadex is a decentralized exchange (DEX) built on the Polkadot network. It offers high-performance, low-latency trading with a fully decentralized order book. Users can trade assets across different parachains within the Polkadot ecosystem and external blockchains connected via bridges. Polkadex uses L2 scaling solutions for fast, efficient trading and operates on a non-custodial model, allowing users to retain control of their funds at all times.
About Arbitrum Nova
Arbitrum Nova is a high-performance alternative to Arbitrum One's chain. While Arbitrum One implements the purely trustless Rollup protocol, Arbitrum Nova implements the mostly trustless AnyTrust protocol. The key difference between Rollup and AnyTrust is that the AnyTrust protocol introduces an additional trust assumption in the form of a Data Availability Committee (DAC). This committee (detailed below) is responsible for expediting the process of storing, batching, and posting child chain transaction data to Ethereum's parent chain. This lets you use Arbitrum in scenarios that demand performance and affordability, while Arbitrum One is optimal for scenarios that demand Ethereum's pure trustlessness.