- Compare
- Particle vs Arbitrum Nova
Particle vs Arbitrum Nova Scalability
Real-time TPS
Particle and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Particle and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Particle and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Transaction Volume
Particle and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Block Time
Particle and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Finality
Particle and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Type
Particle and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Launch Date
Particle and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Particle vs Arbitrum Nova Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Particle and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Miners
Particle and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Hashrate
Particle and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Particle and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Governance
Particle and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Other Comparisons
Particle Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Particle
Particle Network radically simplifies Web3’s user experience through Wallet Abstraction and Chain Abstraction. Through its Wallet Abstraction SDKs, developers can enable one-click onboarding into smart accounts through social logins. Furthermore, Particle Network’s Chain Abstraction stack, with Universal Accounts as a flagship product, enables users to have a unified account and balance across every chain.
About Arbitrum Nova
Arbitrum Nova is a high-performance alternative to Arbitrum One's chain. While Arbitrum One implements the purely trustless Rollup protocol, Arbitrum Nova implements the mostly trustless AnyTrust protocol. The key difference between Rollup and AnyTrust is that the AnyTrust protocol introduces an additional trust assumption in the form of a Data Availability Committee (DAC). This committee (detailed below) is responsible for expediting the process of storing, batching, and posting child chain transaction data to Ethereum's parent chain. This lets you use Arbitrum in scenarios that demand performance and affordability, while Arbitrum One is optimal for scenarios that demand Ethereum's pure trustlessness.