- Compare
- Optimism vs Arbitrum Nova
Optimism vs Arbitrum Nova Scalability
Real-time TPS
Optimism TPS is 21.73 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Optimism max TPS is 200.2 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Optimism max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Transaction Volume
Optimism transaction volume is 78,235 txns, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Block Time
Optimism block time is 2s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Finality
Optimism finality is 16m 48s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Type
Optimism is a layer 2 blockchain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Launch Date
Optimism was launched on Dec 16, 2021, while the Arbitrum Nova has no data
Optimism vs Arbitrum Nova Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Optimism Nakamoto Coefficient is 1, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Validators/Miners
Optimism has 1 validators, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Stake/Hashrate
Optimism and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Optimism is Rollup (Optimistic), while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Governance
Optimism governance is on-chain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Other Comparisons
Optimism Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Optimism
Optimism provides a Layer 2 scaling fix for Ethereum, greatly boosting its scalability and cutting down on gas fees. It maintains robust security measures and guarantees a smooth development experience. Through Optimistic Rollups, it enables swift transaction processing, positioning Ethereum as a viable option for deploying intricate and interactive applications.
About Arbitrum Nova
Arbitrum Nova is a high-performance alternative to Arbitrum One's chain. While Arbitrum One implements the purely trustless Rollup protocol, Arbitrum Nova implements the mostly trustless AnyTrust protocol. The key difference between Rollup and AnyTrust is that the AnyTrust protocol introduces an additional trust assumption in the form of a Data Availability Committee (DAC). This committee (detailed below) is responsible for expediting the process of storing, batching, and posting child chain transaction data to Ethereum's parent chain. This lets you use Arbitrum in scenarios that demand performance and affordability, while Arbitrum One is optimal for scenarios that demand Ethereum's pure trustlessness.