- Compare
- Mantle vs Arbitrum Nova
Mantle vs Arbitrum Nova Scalability
Real-time TPS
Mantle and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Mantle and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Mantle and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Transaction Volume
Mantle and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Block Time
Mantle and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Finality
Mantle and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Type
Mantle and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Launch Date
Mantle and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Mantle vs Arbitrum Nova Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Mantle and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Miners
Mantle and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Hashrate
Mantle and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Mantle and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Governance
Mantle and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Other Comparisons
Mantle Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Mantle
Mantle Network is dedicated to building an EVM-compatible scaling solution for Ethereum. This means that all contracts and tools running on Ethereum can operate on the Mantle Network with minimal modifications. Taking advantage of its modular architecture, Mantle Network combines an optimistic rollup with various innovative data availability solutions, providing cheaper and more accessible data availability while inheriting the security of Ethereum.
About Arbitrum Nova
Arbitrum Nova is a high-performance alternative to Arbitrum One's chain. While Arbitrum One implements the purely trustless Rollup protocol, Arbitrum Nova implements the mostly trustless AnyTrust protocol. The key difference between Rollup and AnyTrust is that the AnyTrust protocol introduces an additional trust assumption in the form of a Data Availability Committee (DAC). This committee (detailed below) is responsible for expediting the process of storing, batching, and posting child chain transaction data to Ethereum's parent chain. This lets you use Arbitrum in scenarios that demand performance and affordability, while Arbitrum One is optimal for scenarios that demand Ethereum's pure trustlessness.