Kaia vs Arbitrum Nova Scalability
Real-time TPS
Kaia TPS is 13.62 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Kaia max TPS is 3,142 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Kaia max theoretical TPS is 28,922 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Transaction Volume
Kaia transaction volume is 49,020 txns, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Block Time
Kaia block time is 1s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Finality
Kaia finality is 0s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Type
Kaia is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Launch Date
Kaia was launched on Jun 27, 2019, while the Arbitrum Nova has no data
Kaia vs Arbitrum Nova Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Kaia Nakamoto Coefficient is 2, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Validators/Miners
Kaia has 41 validators, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Stake/Hashrate
Kaia stake is $355.9M, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Kaia is PoS, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Governance
Kaia governance is council, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Other Comparisons
Kaia Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Kaia
Kaia (ex. Klaytn), an open-source public blockchain created by South Korean internet giant Kakao, prioritizes the metaverse, gaming, and the creator economy. Tailored for the evolving on-chain landscape, Kaia underscores enterprise-grade reliability through its optimized, Byzantine Fault Tolerant (BFT)-based blockchain. Kaia's mission is to decrease the operational costs of blockchain applications, enhance accessibility for end-users, and streamline technology adoption across industries.
About Arbitrum Nova
Arbitrum Nova is a high-performance alternative to Arbitrum One's chain. While Arbitrum One implements the purely trustless Rollup protocol, Arbitrum Nova implements the mostly trustless AnyTrust protocol. The key difference between Rollup and AnyTrust is that the AnyTrust protocol introduces an additional trust assumption in the form of a Data Availability Committee (DAC). This committee (detailed below) is responsible for expediting the process of storing, batching, and posting child chain transaction data to Ethereum's parent chain. This lets you use Arbitrum in scenarios that demand performance and affordability, while Arbitrum One is optimal for scenarios that demand Ethereum's pure trustlessness.