- Compare
- Centrifuge Chain vs Arbitrum Nova
Centrifuge Chain vs Arbitrum Nova Scalability
Real-time TPS
Centrifuge Chain and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Centrifuge Chain and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Centrifuge Chain and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Transaction Volume
Centrifuge Chain and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Block Time
Centrifuge Chain and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Finality
Centrifuge Chain and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Type
Centrifuge Chain and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Launch Date
Centrifuge Chain and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Centrifuge Chain vs Arbitrum Nova Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Centrifuge Chain and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Miners
Centrifuge Chain and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Hashrate
Centrifuge Chain and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Centrifuge Chain and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Governance
Centrifuge Chain and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Other Comparisons
Centrifuge Chain Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Centrifuge Chain
Centrifuge is the infrastructure that facilitates the decentralized financing of real-world assets natively on-chain, creating a fully transparent market which allows borrowers and lenders to transact without unnecessary intermediaries.
About Arbitrum Nova
Arbitrum Nova is a high-performance alternative to Arbitrum One's chain. While Arbitrum One implements the purely trustless Rollup protocol, Arbitrum Nova implements the mostly trustless AnyTrust protocol. The key difference between Rollup and AnyTrust is that the AnyTrust protocol introduces an additional trust assumption in the form of a Data Availability Committee (DAC). This committee (detailed below) is responsible for expediting the process of storing, batching, and posting child chain transaction data to Ethereum's parent chain. This lets you use Arbitrum in scenarios that demand performance and affordability, while Arbitrum One is optimal for scenarios that demand Ethereum's pure trustlessness.