Avalanche vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
Avalanche TPS is 63.38% lower than Polygon TPS
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Avalanche max TPS is 71.41% lower than Polygon max TPS
Max Theoretical TPS
Avalanche max theoretical TPS is 1.67X higher than Polygon max theoretical TPS
Transaction Volume
Avalanche transaction volume is 63.38% lower than Polygon transaction volume
Block Time
Avalanche block time is 9.14% shorter than Polygon block time
Finality
Avalanche finality is 60% shorter than Polygon finality
Type
Avalanche is a layer 1 blockchain, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
Avalanche was launched 4 months after Polygon
Avalanche vs Polygon Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Avalanche Nakamoto Coefficient is 7.75X higher than Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient
Validators
Avalanche has 14X more validators than Polygon
Stake
Avalanche stake is 230.2M AVAX, while Polygon stake is 3.507B MATIC
Consensus Mechanism
Avalanche and Polygon are both PoS
Governance
Avalanche on-chain governance is better than Polygon off-chain governance
Avalanche vs Polygon Real-Time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Avalanche Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Avalanche
Avalanche emerges as a rapid, scalable blockchain platform facilitating the seamless creation and deployment of dApps. Distinguished by its unique consensus mechanism, it's particularly good for DeFi applications, allowing high throughput and nearly instant finality. Its architecture allows for a network of interconnected blockchains, each safeguarded by dynamic subsets of validators, ensuring scalability while maintaining speed, reliability, and security.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being MATIC. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.