Compare Avalanche vs Polygon
Open in ChatGPTAvalanche vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Avalanche TPS is 65% lower than Polygon TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Avalanche max TPS is 55.11% lower than Polygon max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Avalanche max theoretical TPS is 49.97% lower than Polygon max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Avalanche transaction volume is 64.99% lower than Polygon transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Avalanche block time is 42.1% shorter than Polygon block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Avalanche finality is 60% shorter than Polygon finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Avalanche is a layer 1 blockchain, while Polygon is a sidechain
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
Avalanche has 82.4% fewer total transactions than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Avalanche was launched 4 months after Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Avalanche vs Polygon Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Avalanche Nakamoto Coefficient is 5.25X higher than Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Avalanche has 6.06X more validators than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Avalanche stake is 5.13X higher than Polygon stake
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Avalanche and Polygon are both PoS
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Avalanche on-chain governance is better than Polygon off-chain governance
Data from Chainspect
Avalanche vs Polygon Developer Activity
Developers
Avalanche has 54.7% fewer developers than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Avalanche has 1.2X more commits than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Avalanche has 31.32% fewer repos than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Avalanche has 28.51% fewer stars than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Avalanche has 23.87% fewer watchers than Polygon
Data from Chainspect
Avalanche vs Polygon Financials New
Chain Revenue
Avalanche chain revenue is 96.42% lower than Polygon chain revenue
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Avalanche average transaction fee is 88.64% lower than Polygon average transaction fee
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Avalanche market cap is 4.25X higher than Polygon market cap
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Avalanche FDV is 7.05X higher than Polygon FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Avalanche Market Cap to FDV ratio is 39.67% lower than Polygon Market Cap to FDV ratio
Data from Chainspect
Price
Avalanche price is 105X higher than Polygon price
Data from Chainspect
Avalanche vs Polygon Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Avalanche Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Avalanche
Avalanche emerges as a rapid, scalable blockchain platform facilitating the seamless creation and deployment of dApps. Distinguished by its unique consensus mechanism, it's particularly good for DeFi applications, allowing high throughput and nearly instant finality. Its architecture allows for a network of interconnected blockchains, each safeguarded by dynamic subsets of validators, ensuring scalability while maintaining speed, reliability, and security.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being POL. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.