- Compare
- Avalanche vs Arbitrum Nova
Avalanche vs Arbitrum Nova Scalability
Real-time TPS
Avalanche TPS is 25.3 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Avalanche max TPS is 122.7 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Avalanche max theoretical TPS is 1,191 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Transaction Volume
Avalanche transaction volume is 91,097 txns, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Block Time
Avalanche block time is 1.86s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Finality
Avalanche finality is 2s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Type
Avalanche is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Launch Date
Avalanche was launched on Sep 21, 2020, while the Arbitrum Nova has no data
Avalanche vs Arbitrum Nova Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Avalanche Nakamoto Coefficient is 29, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Validators/Miners
Avalanche has 936 validators, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Stake/Hashrate
Avalanche stake is $5.206B, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Avalanche is PoS, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Governance
Avalanche governance is on-chain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Other Comparisons
Avalanche Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Avalanche
Avalanche emerges as a rapid, scalable blockchain platform facilitating the seamless creation and deployment of dApps. Distinguished by its unique consensus mechanism, it's particularly good for DeFi applications, allowing high throughput and nearly instant finality. Its architecture allows for a network of interconnected blockchains, each safeguarded by dynamic subsets of validators, ensuring scalability while maintaining speed, reliability, and security.
About Arbitrum Nova
Arbitrum Nova is a high-performance alternative to Arbitrum One's chain. While Arbitrum One implements the purely trustless Rollup protocol, Arbitrum Nova implements the mostly trustless AnyTrust protocol. The key difference between Rollup and AnyTrust is that the AnyTrust protocol introduces an additional trust assumption in the form of a Data Availability Committee (DAC). This committee (detailed below) is responsible for expediting the process of storing, batching, and posting child chain transaction data to Ethereum's parent chain. This lets you use Arbitrum in scenarios that demand performance and affordability, while Arbitrum One is optimal for scenarios that demand Ethereum's pure trustlessness.