- Compare
- Aeternity vs Arbitrum Nova
Aeternity vs Arbitrum Nova Scalability
Real-time TPS
Aeternity TPS is 0.1 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Aeternity max TPS is 9.29 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Aeternity max theoretical TPS is 120.1 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Transaction Volume
Aeternity transaction volume is 376 txns, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Block Time
Aeternity block time is 2m 19s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Finality
Aeternity finality is 1h, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Type
Aeternity is a layer 1 blockchain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Launch Date
Aeternity was launched on Nov 28, 2018, while the Arbitrum Nova has no data
Aeternity vs Arbitrum Nova Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Aeternity Nakamoto Coefficient is 1, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Validators/Miners
Aeternity has 3 miners, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Stake/Hashrate
Aeternity hashrate is 3.49 KGp/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Aeternity is PoW, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Governance
Aeternity governance is on-chain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Other Comparisons
Aeternity Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Aeternity
Engineered to scale and last, æternity is an easily accessible blockchain platform for the global public. With numerous innovative functionalities and performance far ahead of earlier blockchains, æternity allows its users and community to seamlessly venture into the new era of society, economy, and digital interactions.
About Arbitrum Nova
Arbitrum Nova is a high-performance alternative to Arbitrum One's chain. While Arbitrum One implements the purely trustless Rollup protocol, Arbitrum Nova implements the mostly trustless AnyTrust protocol. The key difference between Rollup and AnyTrust is that the AnyTrust protocol introduces an additional trust assumption in the form of a Data Availability Committee (DAC). This committee (detailed below) is responsible for expediting the process of storing, batching, and posting child chain transaction data to Ethereum's parent chain. This lets you use Arbitrum in scenarios that demand performance and affordability, while Arbitrum One is optimal for scenarios that demand Ethereum's pure trustlessness.