Zeitgeist vs Arbitrum Nova Scalability
Real-time TPS
Zeitgeist TPS is 0 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Zeitgeist max TPS is 0.11 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Zeitgeist max theoretical TPS is 1,500 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Transaction Volume
Zeitgeist transaction volume is 0 txns, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Block Time
Zeitgeist block time is 13.56s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Finality
Zeitgeist finality is 30s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Type
Zeitgeist is a parachain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Launch Date
Zeitgeist was launched on Jan 13, 2022, while the Arbitrum Nova has no data
Zeitgeist vs Arbitrum Nova Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Zeitgeist Nakamoto Coefficient is 174, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Validators/Miners
Zeitgeist has 600 validators, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Stake/Hashrate
Zeitgeist stake is $2.947B, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Zeitgeist is Nominated Proof of Stake, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Governance
Zeitgeist governance is on-chain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Other Comparisons
Zeitgeist Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Zeitgeist
Zeitgeist is a decentralized network designed for establishing, wagering on, and settling prediction markets, enabling users to craft intricate financial agreements on a wide range of subjects. The platform's native currency, ZTG, serves to influence the network's direction and acts as a final recourse for dispute resolution within its decentralized court system.
About Arbitrum Nova
Arbitrum Nova is a high-performance alternative to Arbitrum One's chain. While Arbitrum One implements the purely trustless Rollup protocol, Arbitrum Nova implements the mostly trustless AnyTrust protocol. The key difference between Rollup and AnyTrust is that the AnyTrust protocol introduces an additional trust assumption in the form of a Data Availability Committee (DAC). This committee (detailed below) is responsible for expediting the process of storing, batching, and posting child chain transaction data to Ethereum's parent chain. This lets you use Arbitrum in scenarios that demand performance and affordability, while Arbitrum One is optimal for scenarios that demand Ethereum's pure trustlessness.