Moonbeam vs Arbitrum Nova Scalability
Real-time TPS
Moonbeam TPS is 1.06 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Moonbeam max TPS is 29.3 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Moonbeam max theoretical TPS is 58.4 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Transaction Volume
Moonbeam transaction volume is 3,816 txns, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Block Time
Moonbeam block time is 6.12s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Finality
Moonbeam finality is 30s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Type
Moonbeam is a parachain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Launch Date
Moonbeam was launched on Jan 11, 2022, while the Arbitrum Nova has no data
Moonbeam vs Arbitrum Nova Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Moonbeam Nakamoto Coefficient is 174, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Validators/Miners
Moonbeam has 600 validators, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Stake/Hashrate
Moonbeam stake is $2.947B, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Moonbeam is Nominated Proof of Stake, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Governance
Moonbeam governance is on-chain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Other Comparisons
Moonbeam Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Moonbeam
Moonbeam is an EVM-compatible smart contracts platform built in the Polkadot ecosystem. It's designed for seamless compatibility with Ethereum tooling to provide a user-friendly environment for porting existing and developing new dApps. Also, as the biggest Polkadot parachain Moonbeam encourages cross-chain communication with other parachains.
About Arbitrum Nova
Arbitrum Nova is a high-performance alternative to Arbitrum One's chain. While Arbitrum One implements the purely trustless Rollup protocol, Arbitrum Nova implements the mostly trustless AnyTrust protocol. The key difference between Rollup and AnyTrust is that the AnyTrust protocol introduces an additional trust assumption in the form of a Data Availability Committee (DAC). This committee (detailed below) is responsible for expediting the process of storing, batching, and posting child chain transaction data to Ethereum's parent chain. This lets you use Arbitrum in scenarios that demand performance and affordability, while Arbitrum One is optimal for scenarios that demand Ethereum's pure trustlessness.