- Compare
- Gnosis Chain vs Arbitrum Nova
Gnosis Chain vs Arbitrum Nova Scalability
Real-time TPS
Gnosis Chain TPS is 2.18 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Gnosis Chain max TPS is 80.9 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Gnosis Chain max theoretical TPS is 161.9 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Transaction Volume
Gnosis Chain transaction volume is 7,853 txns, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Block Time
Gnosis Chain block time is 5.15s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Finality
Gnosis Chain finality is 2m 40s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Type
Gnosis Chain is a sidechain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Launch Date
Gnosis Chain was launched on Oct 8, 2018, while the Arbitrum Nova has no data
Gnosis Chain vs Arbitrum Nova Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Gnosis Chain and Arbitrum Nova have no data
Validators/Miners
Gnosis Chain has 328,800 validators, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Stake/Hashrate
Gnosis Chain stake is $47.93M, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Gnosis Chain is PoS, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Governance
Gnosis Chain governance is multisig, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Other Comparisons
Gnosis Chain Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Gnosis Chain
Gnosis Chain operates as an execution-layer Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) chain, utilizing the xDAI stablecoin for transactions and fee payments. Its security is ensured by the Gnosis Beacon Chain (GBC), which employs a Proof-of-Stake consensus mechanism akin to Cardano and Solana. Users stake GNO tokens to participate in transaction validation, earning additional GNO rewards for contributing to network security.
About Arbitrum Nova
Arbitrum Nova is a high-performance alternative to Arbitrum One's chain. While Arbitrum One implements the purely trustless Rollup protocol, Arbitrum Nova implements the mostly trustless AnyTrust protocol. The key difference between Rollup and AnyTrust is that the AnyTrust protocol introduces an additional trust assumption in the form of a Data Availability Committee (DAC). This committee (detailed below) is responsible for expediting the process of storing, batching, and posting child chain transaction data to Ethereum's parent chain. This lets you use Arbitrum in scenarios that demand performance and affordability, while Arbitrum One is optimal for scenarios that demand Ethereum's pure trustlessness.