- Compare
- Crust vs Arbitrum Nova
Crust vs Arbitrum Nova Scalability
Real-time TPS
Crust TPS is 0 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Crust max TPS is 0.06 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Crust max theoretical TPS is 1,500 tx/s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Transaction Volume
Crust transaction volume is 0 txns, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Block Time
Crust block time is 15.14s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Finality
Crust finality is 30s, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Type
Crust is a parachain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Launch Date
Crust was launched on Nov 21, 2022, while the Arbitrum Nova has no data
Crust vs Arbitrum Nova Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Crust Nakamoto Coefficient is 174, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Validators/Miners
Crust has 600 validators, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Stake/Hashrate
Crust stake is $2.947B, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Consensus Mechanism
Crust is Nominated Proof of Stake, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Governance
Crust governance is on-chain, while Arbitrum Nova has no data
Other Comparisons
Crust Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Crust
Crust is a decentralized storage network built on Polkadot, a multi-chain blockchain platform. It aims to provide a decentralized storage solution that is secure, reliable, and cost-effective. Crust allows users to store and retrieve data in a web3 manner, leveraging the power of blockchain technology to ensure data integrity and availability. Crust uses a combination of blockchain and decentralized storage technologies to achieve its goals. It offers incentives for users to contribute their storage space to the network, creating a distributed storage infrastructure that is resistant to censorship and single points of failure.
About Arbitrum Nova
Arbitrum Nova is a high-performance alternative to Arbitrum One's chain. While Arbitrum One implements the purely trustless Rollup protocol, Arbitrum Nova implements the mostly trustless AnyTrust protocol. The key difference between Rollup and AnyTrust is that the AnyTrust protocol introduces an additional trust assumption in the form of a Data Availability Committee (DAC). This committee (detailed below) is responsible for expediting the process of storing, batching, and posting child chain transaction data to Ethereum's parent chain. This lets you use Arbitrum in scenarios that demand performance and affordability, while Arbitrum One is optimal for scenarios that demand Ethereum's pure trustlessness.