- Compare
- Arbitrum Nova vs Zeitgeist
Arbitrum Nova vs Zeitgeist Scalability
Real-time TPS
Arbitrum Nova has no data, while Zeitgeist TPS is 0.0006 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum Nova has no data, while Zeitgeist max TPS is 0.11 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum Nova has no data, while Zeitgeist max theoretical TPS is 1,500 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Arbitrum Nova has no data, while Zeitgeist transaction volume is 2 txns
Block Time
Arbitrum Nova has no data, while Zeitgeist block time is 13.33s
Finality
Arbitrum Nova has no data, while Zeitgeist finality is 30s
Type
Arbitrum Nova has no data, while Zeitgeist is a parachain
Launch Date
Arbitrum Nova has no data, while Zeitgeist was launched on Jan 13, 2022
Arbitrum Nova vs Zeitgeist Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nova has no data, while Zeitgeist Nakamoto Coefficient is 174
Validators/Miners
Arbitrum Nova has no data, while Zeitgeist has 600 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Arbitrum Nova has no data, while Zeitgeist stake is $2.947B
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum Nova has no data, while Zeitgeist is Nominated Proof of Stake
Governance
Arbitrum Nova has no data, while Zeitgeist governance is on-chain
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Nova Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum Nova
Arbitrum Nova is a high-performance alternative to Arbitrum One's chain. While Arbitrum One implements the purely trustless Rollup protocol, Arbitrum Nova implements the mostly trustless AnyTrust protocol. The key difference between Rollup and AnyTrust is that the AnyTrust protocol introduces an additional trust assumption in the form of a Data Availability Committee (DAC). This committee (detailed below) is responsible for expediting the process of storing, batching, and posting child chain transaction data to Ethereum's parent chain. This lets you use Arbitrum in scenarios that demand performance and affordability, while Arbitrum One is optimal for scenarios that demand Ethereum's pure trustlessness.
About Zeitgeist
Zeitgeist is a decentralized network designed for establishing, wagering on, and settling prediction markets, enabling users to craft intricate financial agreements on a wide range of subjects. The platform's native currency, ZTG, serves to influence the network's direction and acts as a final recourse for dispute resolution within its decentralized court system.