- Compare
- XDC Network vs Polygon
XDC Network vs Polygon Scalability
Real-time TPS
XDC Network has no data, while Polygon TPS is 46.9 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
XDC Network has no data, while Polygon max TPS is 429.1 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
XDC Network has no data, while Polygon max theoretical TPS is 714.3 tx/s
Transaction Volume
XDC Network has no data, while Polygon transaction volume is 168,832 txns
Block Time
XDC Network has no data, while Polygon block time is 2.13s
Finality
XDC Network has no data, while Polygon finality is 5s
Type
XDC Network has no data, while Polygon is a sidechain
Launch Date
XDC Network has no data, while Polygon was launched on May 30, 2020
XDC Network vs Polygon Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
XDC Network has no data, while Polygon Nakamoto Coefficient is 4
Validators/Miners
XDC Network has no data, while Polygon has 103 validators
Stake/Hashrate
XDC Network has no data, while Polygon stake is 3.507B MATIC
Consensus Mechanism
XDC Network has no data, while Polygon is PoS
Governance
XDC Network has no data, while Polygon governance is off-chain
Other Comparisons
XDC Network Comparisons
About Blockchains
About XDC Network
XDC Network is a pioneering blockchain platform tailored to meet the evolving needs of decentralized finance (DeFi) and global trade. With its unparalleled speed, scalability, and cost-efficiency, XDC Network has become the go-to choice for developers creating decentralized applications (DApps) and for users looking to engage in the next generation of financial and trade ecosystems.
About Polygon
Polygon, formerly Matic Network, is a blockchain platform designed to establish a multi-chain system compatible with Ethereum. It employs a proof-of-stake consensus mechanism similar to Ethereum for on-chain transactions, with its native token being MATIC. Functioning as a "layer two" or "sidechain" scaling solution alongside Ethereum, Polygon facilitates quicker transactions and lower fees. Its inception aimed to tackle Ethereum's major challenges, including high fees, subpar user experience, and limited transaction throughput, aspiring to create an "Ethereum's internet of blockchains" or a multi-chain ecosystem of Ethereum-compatible blockchains.