Compare Waterfall vs Polkadot
Open in ChatGPTWaterfall vs Polkadot Scalability
Real-time TPS (1H)
Waterfall TPS is 100% higher than Polkadot TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Waterfall max TPS is 70X higher than Polkadot max TPS
Data from Chainspect
Max Theoretical TPS
Waterfall max theoretical TPS is 42X higher than Polkadot max theoretical TPS
Data from Chainspect
Transaction Volume (1H)
Waterfall transaction volume is 100% higher than Polkadot transaction volume
Data from Chainspect
Block Time (1H)
Waterfall block time is 2.92% shorter than Polkadot block time
Data from Chainspect
Finality
Waterfall finality is 19.99% shorter than Polkadot finality
Data from Chainspect
Type
Waterfall and Polkadot are both layer 1 blockchains
Data from Chainspect
Total Transactions (All time)
Waterfall has 38.95% fewer total transactions than Polkadot
Data from Chainspect
Launch Date
Waterfall was launched 4 years after Polkadot
Data from Chainspect
Waterfall vs Polkadot Decentralization
Nakamoto Coefficient
Waterfall Nakamoto Coefficient is 99.43% lower than Polkadot Nakamoto Coefficient
Data from Chainspect
Validators
Waterfall has 99.33% fewer validators than Polkadot
Data from Chainspect
Stake
Waterfall has no data, while Polkadot stake is $1.043B
Data from Chainspect
Consensus Mechanism
Waterfall is PoS, while Polkadot is Nominated Proof of Stake
Data from Chainspect
Governance
Waterfall council governance is worse than Polkadot on-chain governance
Data from Chainspect
Waterfall vs Polkadot Developer Activity
Developers
Waterfall has 92.58% fewer developers than Polkadot
Data from Chainspect
Commits
Waterfall has 97.75% fewer commits than Polkadot
Data from Chainspect
Repos
Waterfall has 97.82% fewer repos than Polkadot
Data from Chainspect
Stars
Waterfall has 99.99% fewer stars than Polkadot
Data from Chainspect
Watchers
Waterfall has 99.9% fewer watchers than Polkadot
Data from Chainspect
Waterfall vs Polkadot Financials New
Chain Revenue
Waterfall has no data, while Polkadot chain revenue is $0.1142
Data from Chainspect
Average Transaction Fee
Waterfall has no data, while Polkadot average transaction fee is $0.02285
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap
Waterfall has no data, while Polkadot market cap is $2.098B
Data from Chainspect
FDV
Waterfall FDV is 100% lower than Polkadot FDV
Data from Chainspect
Market Cap / FDV
Waterfall has no data, while Polkadot Market Cap to FDV ratio is 80.20%
Data from Chainspect
Price
Waterfall has no data, while Polkadot price is $1.246
Data from Chainspect
Waterfall vs Polkadot Real-time TPS Chart
Loading Data
Other Comparisons
Waterfall Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Waterfall
Waterfall is a highly scalable and decentralized BlockDAG EVM-compatible Layer 1 protocol. Low transaction fees and EVM compatibility make Waterfall the platform of choice for Dapps.
About Polkadot
Polkadot stands out among other blockchain projects for its focus on enhancing the foundational infrastructure of dApps. It aims to enable interoperability between blockchain ecosystems, facilitating seamless communication without intermediaries. Functioning as a "network of networks," Polkadot utilizes parachains — specialized blockchains with unique functionalities and tokens — to enable interaction between diverse blockchain architectures. Powered by the nominated proof-of-stake (PoS) consensus algorithm and drawing inspiration from the Ouroboros protocol, Polkadot offers a robust framework for building interconnected and scalable decentralized systems.