- Compare
- Ronin vs Arbitrum
Ronin vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Ronin has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 32.16 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Ronin has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Ronin has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Ronin has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 115,781 txns
Block Time
Ronin has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Finality
Ronin has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Type
Ronin has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Ronin has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
Ronin vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Ronin has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
Ronin has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Ronin and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Ronin has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Ronin has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Other Comparisons
Ronin Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Ronin
Ronin is purpose-built for gaming. Fast, scalable, and battle-tested by millions of players.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.