Ink vs Arbitrum

Ink vs Arbitrum Scalability

Real-time TPS

Chainspect

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 16.42 tx/s

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
16.42 tx/s

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Chainspect

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
1,358 tx/s

Max Theoretical TPS

Chainspect

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
40,000 tx/s

Transaction Volume

Chainspect

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 59,123 txns

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
59,123 txns

Block Time

Chainspect

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
0.25s

Finality

Chainspect

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Type

Chainspect

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain

Launch Date

Chainspect

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Ink vs Arbitrum Decentralization New

Nakamoto Coefficient

Chainspect

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
1

Validators/Miners

Chainspect

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
1

Stake/Hashrate

Chainspect

Ink and Arbitrum have no data

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo

Consensus Mechanism

Chainspect

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Governance

Chainspect

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Ink

Ink is a cutting-edge Layer 2 (L2) blockchain built on Optimism's Superchain and released by Kraken. As a natural evolution of our mission, Ink will serve as a seamless bridge to DeFi, empowering users to move onchain with confidence and ease. Join the community today.

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

Blockchains Socials

Ink Socials

Arbitrum Socials