Ink vs Arbitrum Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 24.61 tx/s

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
24.61 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 2,036 tx/s

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
2,036 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6,095 tx/s

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 88.6K txns

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
88.6K txns

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
0.25s

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
13m 48s

Data from Chainspect

Type

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum has 2.05B total transactions

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
2.05B txns

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021

Data from Chainspect

Ink vs Arbitrum Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
1

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

Ink and Arbitrum have no data

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
On-chain

Data from Chainspect

Ink vs Arbitrum Developer Activity

Developers

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum has 2,335 developers

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
2,335

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum has 192,268 commits

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
192,268

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum has 132 repos

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
132

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum has 10,728 stars

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
10,728

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum has 1,588 watchers

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
1,588

Data from Chainspect

Ink vs Arbitrum Financials New

Chain Revenue

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum chain revenue is $15.09K

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
$15.09K

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.006607

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
$0.006607

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum market cap is $587.9M

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
$587.9M

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum FDV is $990M

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
$990M

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 59.39%

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
59.39%

Data from Chainspect

Price

Ink has no data, while Arbitrum price is $0.099

Ink logo
Arbitrum logo
$0.099

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Ink

Ink is a cutting-edge Layer 2 (L2) blockchain built on Optimism's Superchain and released by Kraken. As a natural evolution of our mission, Ink will serve as a seamless bridge to DeFi, empowering users to move onchain with confidence and ease. Join the community today.

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

Blockchains Socials

Ink Socials

Arbitrum Socials