- Compare
- Cosmos vs Arbitrum
Cosmos vs Arbitrum Scalability
Real-time TPS
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum TPS is 34.42 tx/s
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s
Max Theoretical TPS
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s
Transaction Volume
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum transaction volume is 123,911 txns
Block Time
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum block time is 0.25s
Finality
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s
Type
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain
Launch Date
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021
Cosmos vs Arbitrum Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1
Validators/Miners
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum has 1 validators
Stake/Hashrate
Cosmos and Arbitrum have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic)
Governance
Cosmos has no data, while Arbitrum governance is on-chain
Other Comparisons
Cosmos Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Cosmos
Cosmos is an ever-expanding ecosystem of interoperable and sovereign blockchain apps and services, built for a decentralized future.
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.