Compare BNB Greenfield vs Acala

BNB Greenfield vs Acala Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

BNB Greenfield TPS is 0.26 tx/s, while Acala has no data

BNB Greenfield logo
0.26 tx/s
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

BNB Greenfield max TPS is 44.96 tx/s, while Acala has no data

BNB Greenfield logo
44.96 tx/s
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

BNB Greenfield max theoretical TPS is 500 tx/s, while Acala has no data

BNB Greenfield logo
500 tx/s
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

BNB Greenfield transaction volume is 924 txns, while Acala has no data

BNB Greenfield logo
924 txns
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

BNB Greenfield block time is 2.52s, while Acala has no data

BNB Greenfield logo
2.52s
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Finality

BNB Greenfield finality is 0s, while Acala has no data

BNB Greenfield logo
0s
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Type

BNB Greenfield is a layer 1 blockchain, while Acala has no data

BNB Greenfield logo
Layer 1 blockchain
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

New

Total Transactions

BNB Greenfield has 34.5M total transactions, while Acala has no data

BNB Greenfield logo
34.5M txns
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

BNB Greenfield was launched on Oct 17, 2023, while the Acala has no data

BNB Greenfield logo
Oct 17, 2023
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

BNB Greenfield vs Acala Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

BNB Greenfield Nakamoto Coefficient is 4, while Acala has no data

BNB Greenfield logo
4
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

BNB Greenfield has 11 validators, while Acala has no data

BNB Greenfield logo
11
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

BNB Greenfield stake is $12.59M, while Acala has no data

BNB Greenfield logo
$12.59M
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

BNB Greenfield is PoS, while Acala has no data

BNB Greenfield logo
Proof of Stake (PoS)
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Governance

BNB Greenfield governance is on-chain, while Acala has no data

BNB Greenfield logo
On-chain
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

BNB Greenfield vs Acala Developer Activity New

Developers

BNB Greenfield has 3,794 developers, while Acala has no data

BNB Greenfield logo
3,794
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Repos

BNB Greenfield has 144 repos, while Acala has no data

BNB Greenfield logo
144
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Commits

BNB Greenfield has 166,001 commits, while Acala has no data

BNB Greenfield logo
166,001
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Stars

BNB Greenfield has 13,671 stars, while Acala has no data

BNB Greenfield logo
13,671
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

BNB Greenfield has 1,680 watchers, while Acala has no data

BNB Greenfield logo
1,680
Acala logo

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About BNB Greenfield

Positioned as the third blockchain within the BNB Chain ecosystem BNB Greenfield utilizes BNB as its native token. In essence, BNB Greenfield aims to offer decentralized storage infrastructure within the expansive BNB Chain ecosystem. This empowers users and dApps to generate, store, and exchange data while retaining full ownership. The potential outcome is the emergence of a new data-centric economy, enabling all participants within the BNB Chain ecosystem to possess, utilize, and monetize data.

About Acala

Acala is the all-in-one DeFi hub of Polkadot. Acala is an Ethereum-compatible platform for financial applications to use smart contracts or built-in protocols with out-of-the-box cross-chain capabilities and robust security.

Blockchains Socials

BNB Greenfield Socials

Acala Socials