Arbitrum vs Massa Scalability

Real-time TPS (1H)

Arbitrum TPS is 23.69 tx/s, while Massa has no data

Arbitrum logo
23.69 tx/s
M

Data from Chainspect

Max TPS (100 blocks)

Arbitrum max TPS is 1,720 tx/s, while Massa has no data

Arbitrum logo
1,720 tx/s
M

Data from Chainspect

Max Theoretical TPS

Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 6,095 tx/s, while Massa has no data

Arbitrum logo
6,095 tx/s
M

Data from Chainspect

Transaction Volume (1H)

Arbitrum transaction volume is 85.3K txns, while Massa has no data

Arbitrum logo
85.3K txns
M

Data from Chainspect

Block Time (1H)

Arbitrum block time is 0.25s, while Massa has no data

Arbitrum logo
0.25s
M

Data from Chainspect

Finality

Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s, while Massa has no data

Arbitrum logo
13m 48s
M

Data from Chainspect

Type

Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Massa has no data

Arbitrum logo
Layer 2 blockchain
M

Data from Chainspect

Total Transactions (All time)

Arbitrum has 1.88B total transactions, while Massa has no data

Arbitrum logo
1.88B txns
M

Data from Chainspect

Launch Date

Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021, while the Massa has no data

Arbitrum logo
Aug 31, 2021
M

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Massa Decentralization

Nakamoto Coefficient

Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1, while Massa has no data

Arbitrum logo
1
M

Data from Chainspect

Validators/Miners

Arbitrum has 1 validators, while Massa has no data

Arbitrum logo
1
M

Data from Chainspect

Stake/Hashrate

Arbitrum and Massa have no data

Arbitrum logo
M

Data from Chainspect

Consensus Mechanism

Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Massa has no data

Arbitrum logo
Rollup (Optimistic)
M

Data from Chainspect

Governance

Arbitrum governance is on-chain, while Massa has no data

Arbitrum logo
On-chain
M

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Massa Developer Activity

Developers

Arbitrum has 2,378 developers, while Massa has no data

Arbitrum logo
2,378
M

Data from Chainspect

Commits

Arbitrum has 190,386 commits, while Massa has no data

Arbitrum logo
190,386
M

Data from Chainspect

Repos

Arbitrum has 129 repos, while Massa has no data

Arbitrum logo
129
M

Data from Chainspect

Stars

Arbitrum has 10,624 stars, while Massa has no data

Arbitrum logo
10,624
M

Data from Chainspect

Watchers

Arbitrum has 1,616 watchers, while Massa has no data

Arbitrum logo
1,616
M

Data from Chainspect

Arbitrum vs Massa Financials New

Chain Revenue

Arbitrum chain revenue is $21.37K, while Massa has no data

Arbitrum logo
$21.37K
M

Data from Chainspect

Average Transaction Fee

Arbitrum average transaction fee is $0.009611, while Massa has no data

Arbitrum logo
$0.009611
M

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap

Arbitrum market cap is $994.8M, while Massa has no data

Arbitrum logo
$994.8M
M

Data from Chainspect

FDV

Arbitrum FDV is $1.707B, while Massa has no data

Arbitrum logo
$1.707B
M

Data from Chainspect

Market Cap / FDV

Arbitrum Market Cap to FDV ratio is 58.27%, while Massa has no data

Arbitrum logo
58.27%
M

Data from Chainspect

Price

Arbitrum price is $0.1707, while Massa has no data

Arbitrum logo
$0.1707
M

Data from Chainspect

Other Comparisons

About Blockchains

About Arbitrum

Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.

About Massa

Massa is the Layer 1 that brings true decentralization to where it’s needed.

Blockchains Socials

Arbitrum Socials

Massa Socials