- Compare
- Arbitrum vs Mantle
Arbitrum vs Mantle Scalability
Real-time TPS
Arbitrum TPS is 28.46 tx/s, while Mantle has no data
Max TPS (100 blocks)
Arbitrum max TPS is 1,358 tx/s, while Mantle has no data
Max Theoretical TPS
Arbitrum max theoretical TPS is 40,000 tx/s, while Mantle has no data
Transaction Volume
Arbitrum transaction volume is 102,472 txns, while Mantle has no data
Block Time
Arbitrum block time is 0.25s, while Mantle has no data
Finality
Arbitrum finality is 13m 48s, while Mantle has no data
Type
Arbitrum is a layer 2 blockchain, while Mantle has no data
Launch Date
Arbitrum was launched on Aug 31, 2021, while the Mantle has no data
Arbitrum vs Mantle Decentralization New
Nakamoto Coefficient
Arbitrum Nakamoto Coefficient is 1, while Mantle has no data
Validators/Miners
Arbitrum has 1 validators, while Mantle has no data
Stake/Hashrate
Arbitrum and Mantle have no data
Consensus Mechanism
Arbitrum is Rollup (Optimistic), while Mantle has no data
Governance
Arbitrum governance is on-chain, while Mantle has no data
Other Comparisons
Arbitrum Comparisons
About Blockchains
About Arbitrum
Arbitrum serves as a Layer 2 scaling solution for Ethereum, leveraging rollups to significantly boost scalability and reduce transaction costs while maintaining robust security. It enables developers to execute EVM-compatible smart contracts with a substantially higher transaction throughput and lower fees compared to Ethereum's main chain, making it a compelling platform for decentralized application development.
About Mantle
Mantle Network is dedicated to building an EVM-compatible scaling solution for Ethereum. This means that all contracts and tools running on Ethereum can operate on the Mantle Network with minimal modifications. Taking advantage of its modular architecture, Mantle Network combines an optimistic rollup with various innovative data availability solutions, providing cheaper and more accessible data availability while inheriting the security of Ethereum.